Search results

1 good (hopefully) creative, 2 crap ones. 2 relateds for each (but I'll struggle for time if they specify two relateds haha)

I can't imagine a 6 marker on your chemist- there isn't enough to talk about. Iirc there was a 3 marker on it last year (or maybe year before) so I doubt they'd retest it. Personally, I'd love a Haber question but that might be too easy for those devious minds at BOS.

Like three quaterts of BOS- the 6th. Though unofficially I finish on the 17th after paper two english haha- everything else becomes a lot less stressful and stuff after that imo

Actually you do need to know this formula- it has been tested before I'm pretty sure in HSC (if not HSC than in CSSA or IND)

Well I recommend you change it (srs)- there's no way it will be place again.

y=x but you don't need it-> you can tell its this because at every point, the x axis equals the y axis (if that makes sense -> badly worded)

Well between year 1 and 2, income increased by 150 but consumption increased by 90 so the marginal propensity to consume is 90/150=3/5. Therefore the MPS is 2/5 and the multiplier is 1/MPS=5/2 So an increase in investment by $40bn will have a $40x5/2 increase in national income -> $100bn...

Can you post the question?

Consider the parallelogram formed by z1, z2, O and (z1+z2). Now note that |z1|=|z2| so all the side lengths are equal -> therefore its a rhombus Now z1+z2 is one diagonal and z1-z2 is the other (graph the on your Argand diagram to see). But the diagonals of a rhombus intersect at right angles...

No lol- but you are summing 0.2 + 1 + 5 + 25 +... Everything to the right of the 1 is a whole number. So when you add them you get a whole number. So basically, when you add ALL the terms (including the 0.2 at the front), it has to end in 0.2 but the answer doesn't which is an easy way to tell...

Wake up and get into the zone. Read over essays and stuff and then just do some writing so my hand is used to it

A simple way Fawun to check that the answer in the book is wrong is notice that 5 to the power of any integer is a whole number so you're adding 0.2 (the initial term) to a bunch of whole numbers. Therefore any correct answer has to end in .2, but the answer didn't -> therefore its wrong

Cheers bro :)

Ours was similar as well. I think they have a mindset that the school is all you need to do well so things like tutors, learning ahead etc. are unneccesary.

Read ahead definitely imo. Not sure about your school but ours is too slow for 4U. Give it a try and if you can understand it by yourself, I'd recommend it because it gives you more time to practice

Same as trials. Reading time: Read extended response questions. Pick which two to answer. Form a very rough plan in my head. Flick through rest of short answer (taking especial note of 5 markers) MC: Finish in 10-15 mins -> no real time limit but yeah, just quickly and efficiently Short...

Re: The Loaded Dog: HSC exams - Sydney Morning Herald I agree a lot with this post too (lol why do I agree with conflicting posts?)

Haha we'll see. Anyways, no point worrying about it now. I promise to go hard and if it ends up happening, then it happens :)

Yeah I can accept both at the same time I think- imagine that- $14,000 in the first year haha. Though you know, just casually get .9, no worries- probs won't happen. I'll do my best though (will shout BOS lunch if I do- even Spiral) Edit: Changed first line because it read like I could get...

Haha whoops- that means my answer is wrong :( The method is the thing though lol (I'm a retard)- surprised it still worked though