Search results

you're a moderator, so I would expect that the standard of your posting would be higher than most others here. how about you do the respectful thing and read some of the previous posts before offering your own opinion on whether Loveridge's sentence was just? on why a 20 year sentence would at...

Re: Do you believe the govt should set a minimum quota for women on boards? i think the government should set a maximum quota for women on boards

breaking brudd

Re: 2016 Federal Election we should have a temperature tax

many breaches of the law attract fines. why should voting be any different?

Re: Do you support a wealth tax? i think that taxes should be wealthy

no, i voted for the kampffront schwarz-weiß-rot

Re: Do you think the Board of Studies is fatally flawed? the thigh bone is connected to the thigh meat

Keiran Loveridge fought for our freedoms.

wrong. yes, the mens rea (mental fault element) for murder is intent to kill or reckless indifference to human life, which means recklessness as to the probability of causing death (where probability means 'likely'; almost certain; so on and so forth). intent would be impossible to...

sorry sir hey maybe if we were in england that would be relevant

loveridge is the assange of our times.

R v Fenton is authority for whether evidence of intoxication can be adduced to establish diminished responsibility, a partial defence which would reduce a finding of murder to manslaughter, not for establishing the required mens rea for murder. the purpose of s 428 E is to ensure that anyone...

i voted for the volksblock der inflationsgeschädigten

aren't maximum sentences reserved for the most heinous breaches of a particular crime? actually it is. likelihood of reoffence, prospects of rehabilitation, remorse, guilty plea. maybe you could read the provision i linked? go tell that to the sentencing judge. do you reckon he just made it...

i apologise for my hasty application of deductive logic. maybe your friend isn't an idiot just because you are. no, you're wrong. read it again. evidence of self-induced intoxication is not relevant for establishing the mens rea for manslaughter, not murder. in fact, the entire section is...

please elaborate

yes

if you read my post you would realise that self-induced intoxication is relevant regarding establishing the mental elements necessary for a finding of murder. your inability to read previous posts leads me to believe that you are an idiot. chances are your mate who got """"beat down"""" was...

ignores previous post: ☑ appeal to emotions of victim's family: ☑ sentence length determined according to some arbitrary standard: ☑ harebrained notion that spontaneous, alcohol fueled violence is rational: ☑ if you think throwing this kid in gaol for 10 years is in anyone's interests, let...