Consider it logically then? Social setting encourages social interaction, leading to cultural diversity.
Social interaction instagates activity, leading to happiness? Happiness is vital for society?
Hahaha yesss its true. All the doctors at 3rd world countries are depressed. All our social workers are unhappy bastards...
Dont think red makes your arguement rational buddy. It dosent.
Read some socialiogical studies? Hell, some psychological books? Naw, just experience happiness. Then...
It is not a belief. SCIENCE has shown that religion is vital for humanity. And so we should not fund education, because it is a belief by you and I, that it is good for society.
I also think, believe, sporting clubs encourages social interaction and multiculturalism. Lets not fund that too.
So if i rob you at gunpoint, but I spend the money going to university. Theres nothing wrong with that?
Im sick of this crap... please do understand my point of view.
Firstly, your missing my point. I believe as strongly, perhaps stronger, that education is neccessary for the thriving of society. However, others may view not so, and yet they still do pay taxes.
Secondly, you stated your against taxpayers funding happiness without return/ just generally. Do...
I answer, some post above with this as well.
Well... see everythign is relative. You believe one thing, we believe another. Just as you believe Religious institutions are no benefit to society, SOME PEOPLE (does not reflect my own views) do believe education institutions are no benefit to...
If that is truly your believe, I do feel much better, that it is not a discrimination towards religious institutions. Yet, I argue forth...
Recreation allows the derivation of happiness, joy, pleasure, all of which are neccessary for society to thrive. This I do believe is "neccessary"...
Defence is vital, but not for building a nuclear arsenal. (I hope your being sarcastic?) I believe we are at a stage in the world now, that such argressive methods of "protection" is unncessary, due to dipolmacy.
But non the less, defence is vital, for state emergencies. A formidabble example...
O dear... please dont play the no. game. I tell you now, the funding recieved by the Church is WAY WAY WAY LESS then funding given to other organisations. It is far imporportional, considering that almost 20% (was it) attend churches. I do wish, even if 100 million was granted to the church, a...
This in itself is absurd. It is not just funding believes, but as you recognised, benefits to society. There may be people that are impoverished, who desire Spiritual enlightenment? How are we going to provide for them?
But then secondly, SPORT, also provide "bad views" as you so called them...
Lol. This has nothing to do with caring or not, and we are not demanding special treatment.
The church is a very basic form of socialisation. It is fundemental to society, (at least ours), granting countless benefits. It is similar in its status to a sports club, the provides for society...
Now... thats just irrational. I didnt see on that census, that stated 65% of Australi was rich, and had money to fund themselves...
But that being said, the reality is, most churches do fund themselves. Especially in this economic climate.
Hahaha... yes recreation grants happiness. However, PLAYSATAION 3 is a luxury. The goverment funds the most basic forms of recreation, like PCYC clubs, that allows fun, joy and happiness to the most impoverished people.
The Church is a similar allegory.
And no, the goverment should not give...
You do forget, that the people who go to church pay taxes as well. That is dangerous, Labour thinking.
Firstly, I do to a certain degree agree with you that these "sporting" clubs, if wealthy enough do not deserve payment. Certainly some wealthy people, take advantage of the goverment and...
We do know what your views on religion are. But to some people, spirituality enhances once life. It offers escape, optimism, truth to lives all across the nation. And by allowing some spark of light, into their lives it does enhance the community.
More solidly speaking, it also transforms...
Just on this one, when using parametrics, as so stated, did anyone get two varaible for one value? If then, how do you solve, since i havent done parametrics yet.
More to go:
w=\frac{z+2i}{2iz-1}, show that when z describes the circle |z| = 1, completely in one direction, then w describes the circle |w|=1 competely in the other direction.
Also this question has me stunned.
Two points, P, Q represent the complex no.s z, 2z+3+i respectively, where P moves on the circle |z|=k how does Q move?