Search results

lol yeah of course, I covered two debated areas :) no more HSC! :D

yeah the test was pretty good, could have been better I suppose but it could also have been a lot worse. haha, I think half of my class fell asleep during the exam, everyone is so overwoked...damn you HSC!!

As above... Question one: 12 (meh, historiography is hell boring) Question two: 17 cause I really like Elizabeth :D:D:D

Well this question was OK, could have been better. I just babbled on about how different historians will interpret the case study in different ways as a result of context, values, experiences. Also their different methodologies, aims and purposes ment that we would be shown different aspects of...

Note: I have VERY large writing, and it gets messy too :p Personality: 10 Society: argh ran out of time, booklet + one page =/ Period: 11 Add. Society: 15. hehe, got a bit carried away on that one CONGRATULATIONS ancient historians of 2004!! It's over! :D:D

I thought the exam was pretty good. Caesar questions were as expected, was able to have fun writing about his death 'This is violence!!' die bastard die!, muahahaha Sparta was OK, kinda ran out of time and stuff to write about land inheritance. I mean, theres only so much you can write...

HAHAHA yeah that would be funny :D I did the death of Marilyn Monroe, quite interesting actually. And NO it wasn't suicide.

Linear B too, that has records of administrative stuff, numbers etc

CSSA Trial questions of 2004 were BAD BAD BAD, they asked for an assessment of Cicero (who the hell cares about him!) and the role of Mithradatic wars & Sparticus revolt in contributing to the down fall of the Repulic. Arghhh, everyone screwed up that section. Lets hope they'll be kinder this...

I came first in my class out of 21 students, assesment mark of about 93.5... hoping I can keep it up for the HSC =/ GOOD LUCK Ancient Historians of 2004!!!

isnt it... Aim = aim of the historian ie what they are trying to do by writing history, why they are writing and who for Purpose = purpose of history ie why do we have history? What is the value of history? why do we study the past? dunno, maybe it's the other way round *shrugs*

I have stuff on context for Elton, Bassnet, Neale, Plowden and Camden.

yep I'm going over it ALL (I know there is so damn much) but it helps to jog the memory even if you don't know every single detail. Just know your dates, sources, opinions and ideas and you'll be fine! :)

This is a good question Hey, don't stress too much about this one, if you've done your work all year you should be fine. Basically, its just asking WHY the different historians have their different interpretations, because we are all inevitably influenced by our context (you should have come...

Hey guys, is everyone ready for Extension? Even after weeks of study I'm still not 100% confident :S Oh well... btw do many ppl have Ancient on Thursday and then Ext. on Friday? Cause its really bad timing...

you gotta be joking

yeah well that one was kinda obvious...haha. Keep us updated!!!

nope. its used as a 'blueprint', cause DNA is the blueprint of life (haha, get it?! sorry, that was bad...:p) DNA unravels, mRNA assembles w/corresponding nucleotides (A-U, G-C) then travels into cytoplasm, tRNA molecules match codons, ribosome does some other stuff and viola! you have a...

easy question! mentioned that theres a lack of donated blood, to meet demand they need to formulate artificial blood. PFC (perflurocarbons) was the example that I used, and although it can carry more O2 than Haemoglobin it cant yet carry nutrients, wastes hormones etc therefore they need to...

let us know how its going will you?