Search results

Yes but that isn't the LIATE rule...

Let me ask you a question. Do you believe that climate change is real? You didn't read my response properly. If his "rule" (or what you call "scientific and logical practice") must be followed then by that same "rule" he too, when claiming that there is no God, must prove that indeed there is...

LIATE also fails with \int x^3 e^{x^2} \ dx

Again the onus is on you to prove that there is no God. Also you said before that if one made a claim about something then they'd need to prove it. Then by your own "rule" since you are making a claim that God is not real then you'd need to prove it. And this is just going by what you're...

Again, there is a point being missed. You can believe whatever you like. But you cannot say that there is no God without having conclusive evidence to justify your claim. I'm not sure what you mean by "overwhelming majority" but there are many things that are in fact true. One example is pi...

Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon Lol you are way too obsessed with complex analysis :P

Well you could start by defining "everything". First of all there is "evidence" for Christianity. For example, the bible. So Christianity isn't based on anything without "a single shred of evidence". I think you've missed my point. People in this thread were saying that Christianity is...

Just because something is illogical it doesn't mean that it's not true. Consider quantum mechanics for example. It defies logic in the traditional sense of classical mechanics. If you made a claim back in the 1700's about the uncertainty principle (say) then people would've called you crazy...

Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon Hahahaha. That made LOL. Owned him :P

That's not actually quite true. Consider this: I believe that the flying spaghetti monster exists and I worship it as my god. Thus my religion is the spaghetti monster. It's actually the onus of the person against me to prove that the flying spaghetti monster does not exist. If they cannot...

I was joking... On a serious note, the op probably saw "unit circle" in the chapter of his/her textbook which contained these questions (for the reason I've outlined in my previous joke)...

Historians and the alike generally don't disagree that Jesus existed. But they doubt the powers he had and stuff...

Probably not that sure since they had guards guarding his tomb LOL.

Because trigonometric identities can be derived from the unit circle. Consider a unit circle x^2 + y^2 =1. If P(cos theta, sin theta) is a point on this unit circle then cos^2 theta + sin^2 theta = 1. Etc

In fact you can't do it using the double angle formula...

Try this: \text{Solve for } 0 \le \theta \le 360^{\circ}: \ \sin 2 \theta = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}

It's funny how the interference and diffraction patterns are crucial to the M-M experiment, but they aren't in the syllabus. But you're expected to know the experiment...

You pay only if you're an international student I believe.

Some people are really good at cramming and can get good marks without working consistently. One example would be annabackwards on these forums :P

whoops my bad -- I meant the complex exponential function.