Search results

Not with that attitude

F = ma. Assuming that travelling towards the left is negative and right is positive, the force due to acceleration is towards the right (acceleration is positive), whereas the particle is travelling towards the left (velocity is negative). Thus, the particle would be experiencing a resisting...

Yeah idk where i was going with that lol.

We got something else resting on our middle finger...

Years of fapping had trained all the guys for paper 2

Well the good thing is that exams are getting easier per year. 2015 one was straightforward, no curveballs

Unless of course your competing for 1st place and came 3rd by 1.5 marks and could have came first if you tried harder in the 4th term assessment....*cries*

Get a private tutor, there are plenty of ads on bos: http://community.boredofstudies.org/482/tutoring-classifieds/345250/english-tutoring-why-you-need-me.html...

Step 1: Sleep in class Step 2: Get a tutor and do work at home Step 3: Profit

I was always stronger in my other subjects so i just gave up on this one to further increase my other subjects. But, by chance, the exam was easier than expected. Basically, in comparison to my other subjects, my internal marks for this subject was the lowest.

Since ES is my 12th unit, i didn't study for it, but even without it, the exam was pree straightforward. All the calc were easy, drawing was easy, even mc was standard. If i had studied for it , i would've got 90 raw. I think i might get low 80's raw, scale to a high 80's maybe even 90...

Pace yourself. I dived straight into doing 5 hrs a night, and yeh I did do good for my term 1 exams, but I kept having periods of just utter demotivation and completely burnt out.

Cool, yeah i know they put up to 2n+1 games in their working, was just confused why they stopped at 2n in their statement

Anyone...

So the q. 14 c) (iii) in the 2015 paper is Pretty simple and I worked it out. But I looked at their answers: And their first line of working out stops at the playing winning 2n games, when I pretty sure you have to include the probability 2n+1 games as well. Am I right or is there am I...

But this is just talking about a regular cohort. Does the same rules apply for someone who is getting an illness/misadventure because they didn't attend? Because how would an accurate pool be created if his external mark does not get included as well? (as he doesn't have an external mark)

So his moderated internal from his appeal DOES get added to the pool of marks?

Last question, will this moderated internal be added to the pool of marks? Or will I end up getting the 2nd highest mark instead of the first?

But doesn't that only consider if the student actually performs the exam. So they'll compare their exam and assessment and then just give the highest as the exam. But what about if they didn't attend? Then they don't have an external altogether (Well i mean, he still has paper 1, but i meant...

Re: HSC 2017 4U Marathon Probs cause realising the denominator becomes less tedious