Search results

are you joking? question 9? legal representation is NOT guaranteed by the constitution. in the Dietrich 1992 case it was only determined that there was a right to legal representation for serious criminal matters. also, do you have a view on question 11?

ajdlinux /\/\/\/\ i cant believe your only 16!! your so smart! you should be studying for the school certificate around about now.

if you google "right to silence" the first thing that comes up is "The right to remain silent, as it is officially called, is a legal right of any person subjected to police interrogation or summoned to go to trial in a court of law" however, the right to remain silent is also protected by the...

how can you argue that the local court is MORE enforceable if its jurisdiction doesnt even cover discrimination? this is a question of enforcing Brian's RIGHTS and not the LAW anyway

lol but i wouldnt want to argue that since my answer for 14 was D. also, did you sit the HSC five years ago? how old are you? there is no way i culd have done anything like SDD when i was 12

if discrimination is under the local court's jurisdiction than it will be more enforceable. obviously, if its not under the local court's jurisdiction, it cannot enforce anything. however, the commision can conduct conciliation, which is, at least, more enforceable than a court that cannot make...

iv gone through heaps of legislation and from what i can gather the local court does not have the power to make determinations with regards to discrimination. the anti discrimination act 1977 specifically states that the local court where here determinations in "summary" and will not directly...

the family questions were so specific, kinda unfair if you ask me, look how general and generic the world order question was "evaluate legal and non-legal ways or working for world order" lucky i dont do family i did: consumers A Workplace B

the extended response section and the crime section were both harder than any other year that i have looked at, especially crime. multiple choice wasnt as bad as last year, still hard though. Im thinking 85 will be the cut off??

can I ask why you think 11 is not d? I personally wrote c but I thought I was wrong. isn't the act of the nsw parliament passing a law evidnce of it using powers outlined in the constitution? I could be wrong. this question took me ages to do coz I was like "since when can the nsw GOVERNMENT...

from hreoc's website: "We help resolve complaints about human rights violation & various discrimination laws through a conciliation..." but in terms of enforceability the local court would be better if it had the jurisdiction to cover discrimination, as conciliation doesn't get you anywhere

isn't it like general knowledge that statute law can override common law? a prima facie case doesn't enforce any rights, it just determines whether or not there was enough evidence for the case to be heard in a higher court. but I guess the question does say "which of the following is BEST...

since when does the local court have a jurisdiction over discrimination matters? that was a stupid question. I had D for 14 but I didn't think any of them were really that correct :/

multiple choice solutions ok, help me create a list of the solutions to multiple choice. there are about 3 ambiguous ones that I'm not sure about. correct me if I'm wrong. 1 d 2 a 3 c 4 c 5 d 6 b 7 a 8 a or b? 9 a 10 d 11 b, c or d? 12 d 13 b 14 a or d? 15 c

lmfao that made me lol so much

^ yer i was tossing between flatmates and neighbours, and assumed neighbours bcoz a son and a husband was mentioned. also they used plain form, which is probly much more typical of neighbours than flatmates..so i think were right :)

over all i thought it was a good test. it wud have been nice if they made it a bit harder for scaling purposes... anyway wat did everyone get for the multiple choice question?? it was really weird, but i settled with "neigbours"

It was relatively easy. There seemed to be alot more questions worth 1 and 2 marks than normal idk. I ran outta time. I spent wayy to long on question 1e integration, and never ended up getting it. Couldnt get the 4 marks at the end of 8a The only other questions i had a problems with were the...

Re: The glory that was section 3. at first i was like WTF this isnt related to anything...but i managed to relate it bioethics and the hajj so ultimately not too shit

i think the first ones A only by elimination can be B coz obvs thats between demoninations cant be C coz thats a legal body and does not involve religious traditions at all cant be D coz thats about ecumenism