Search results

Good luck!!! Your subjects are going to make it hard for you!

I could scrape 99, but I need to well in external eco and maths.

My teacher told us that they could ask us to do the introduction of a narrative, and then ask us to do a reflection on it. Is this like comprehension from paper 1? do you just find techniques in your own work and show how they demonstrate your genre?

AOS is worth 40% of your English Mark, Paper 2 is worth 60%. Is that what you mean?

Although "lets get drunk and f**k random people" is a very, very important aspect of it.

I think that might be pushing it a little, but it depends how much you wrote. If you wrote around 1400 words+ you should be fine

Did you get spell check? I could have used spell check haha

44/45 (14,15,15) 55/60 (19,19,17) I was quite over prepared for English but I also got very lucky in both exams, Was off to a great start such a pity i'm going to fail economics

I think Bandler worked superbly with this particular question (drawing on cultural, historical, religious context) but 90% of my cohort did Sadat

no their judgment isnt final, his mark gets averaged with the other two marks

You should be fine. That's would have been the smart thing to do if you didnt know much about Suu Kyi. That's why I didn't think this question was TOO unfair because you could have just talked about the endings of 3 different speeches

Yeah I can imagine. I'm doing speeches but I have seen that movie. Isn't the final scene his sled from his childhood and its a big twist and a big deal. wow yeah that would be so perfect

I hated that it was ONE related text for module C instead of at least ONE

yeah about 77-79

yeah but it's annoying in the way cause people make so much noise

1100 word/1100 word/950 word

lol, it was really funny just hearing the various reactions around the hall. Some people started giggling and smiling, some people thumped their desk a few guys were like FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU out loud and the supervisor started laughing

It wasn't that bad, all you had to do was say TO SOME EXTENT the ending affects our judgement, but it is the textual integrity and overall unity of the speech that affects our judgement the most, and then basically you write your prepared essay, and just analyse the Suu Kyi extract as if it was...

For me it was: Happiness @ module A --> panick as I saw all the weird extracts and flicked through to final question --> relief as I was it Suu Kyi and not Dean or a more random one --> Panick that it was the ending statements and I didn't know much about them --> acceptance about module B -->...

I agree but less angrily :P people need to stop going to the toilet...Its HSC ffs.