Search results

The problem please. We dont all use your text book, or sleep with it under our beds :hammer:

Ummm, that was long, so Bigger Hydrocarbons = more energy because they break more bonds. heres the proof. The other post was wrong, i misinterpreted. Heres the experiment and the theory.

Energy is produced in a chemical reaction when the energy needed to start it is less than the energy produced in the reaction. (Exothermic) <dl><dd>CH₄ + 2 O₂ → 2 H₂O + CO₂ + Energy</dd></dl> or <dl><dd>C₃H₈ + 5 O₂...

Yeah sorry about the misquote onto wolfram. I got the limits method from wikipedia instead for forming a limit in y=mx+n which is what I was trying to do. so its good now.

This isnt about call, Lauchlan, this is about the debate itself. The problem with free speech is where does censorship end? with Rudd's own views, the right wing anarchist parties that then pertain to an imprtant sector of our bipartisanship? Dont confuse yourself with 3+ syallable words, we...

Right, was looking through for solving oblique asymtotes, and i was wondering how you do it through limits. eg; x+2 ----- x-1 Looks like this ;x+2/x-1 - Wolfram|Alpha I dont like the long division method, it's dodgy. And it doesnt work here. This is fully simplified save (x+2)(X-1)^-1...

And who cares about acceptable living standards? The living of as many as possible and saving as many immediatly overrides any concerns about you being able to run your hummer for the next 50 years. We can save them then cut down and solve the problem. On a moral, predcedential and logical...

On the first point, in line with the topic we're discussing, would you rather some minor concerns about some old people bumbling around and a few people who cant find work or scorched earth with countless murders committed in the name of continueing to run the world off a cliff, as well as the...

I refuse to debate or engage on these grounds because im a religious bigot and therefore I am above such arguements! [drips with sarcasm and lols that this has gone for 1000+ pages without conclusion - religion is debatable, now agree and stfu and accept other people's opinions and stop whining...

Corrrect, we dont kill them but transfer them to work camps like the Abbott Ideal. All heil Herr Abbott and his concentration camps for dole blugders! Renounce your bludging ways and join the rest of Australia who work for their money!

It does, but i think that a slight labour shortage is far less important than saving a couple of billion people. Assuming this problem's coming in as fast as you reckon it is, the balance here is life and death. People can live simply so that others can simply live. Oh, and, about the pensioners...

Hahahaha i think you're all so naive. Look at what you are proposing - you claim that the best way to preserve standards of living is to kill and destroy those of some. As a by-product, you claim that it has a certain darwinian value in allowing the most effective members of our society to...

For the BoS Science paper, the X is Temperature and the Y is time. Remeber those travel graphs we will have to do tomorrow as an example and youll be fine because you Always put dependant on the X. They're coming to get you :skip::chainsaw:

Lol

Nice one! Thank you:bomb: