Search results

I think the 'neutrino faster than light' debacle is out of the HSC scope. Maybe we will be tested on some time/length/mass dilation that has a similar setting 'a neutrino travels from a source 730km away from a detector in Italy at 0.99c', or something like that.

A reduction in the net income deficit means we're paying out less dividends, servicing less interest, etc. It is not buying less imports, that would be a reduction in the net goods component.

I'm the same age as you so the 'immature' thing isn't really an explanation. http://www.nsi.tafensw.edu.au/Courses/CourseDetail.aspx?num=19361&sem=S1/2012&op=MS That's the link to the Bradfield TAFE for HSC Studies.

I reckon the Quanta to Quarks will be relatively similar, and there will be something on Edison vs. Westinghouse...

I really want it to be C, but I believe D is correct.

$500 of it goes to the damn government!!!! Read what others have said!

ATAR goal: 90+ Own ATAR prediction: Lower 90s. Own prediction HSC exams results: English: 85 Economics: 91 Mathematics: 93 Modern History: (Hoping for 86+) Physics: (Hoping for 90+) Required/Wishful HSC exam results for ATAR goal: English: 87 Economics: 95 Mathematics: 95 Modern History: 90...

I put C as well, but I can agree with it being D. If it really is C, I'm going to bloody scream due to joy.

MC: 16/20 zzzzzz Short Answers: 36-38/40 Monetary: 17-18/20 Exchange Rate: 17/20 Approx 86-89%

Maybe, just maybe, revenue is before tax. So it actually *is* $1500, but it changes to $2000 after tax as net income... I don't do business studies so I'm not exactly sure :P

Nope, $500 of that is government revenue ($5 x 100). Therefore, they actually lose $2000.

I offered my presiding officers gum, and they took it haha. Anyways, I can't go anywhere without my beloved '5 Electro'.

Economic expansion refers to an increase in economic growth. Thus, the government would gain more revenue as more people move into higher tax brackets (eco growth leads to increase wages) and unemployment would drop leading to less transfer payments.

What determines the cut-off for a band 6?

It says 'all other things being equal', so if you increased interest rates you would see a decline in growth, so I just went with D.

I'm hoping for a good Weimar question since I haven't studied past 1934 at all lol..

that is exactly how i knew!! Haha!

They're asking for the decrease in foreign producer revenue.

How is his logic flawed? It is completely right. Also, I thought your teacher did this -- how could he/she have gotten it wrong?

Can someone shed some light on 8(b)(ii) pleaseee :)