Search results

someone raised this point earlier, and i agree with u, as to how several have used this as an excuse to protest against the west. But, its quite similiar to how the Americans used 9/11 as an excuse to gain entry into iraq and other midlle eastern countries.

All i have to say is your very arrogant to believe that film was not made with the intention to incite violence. Yes, the violence is not justified but i definitely don't agree with u about the underlying intentions of this film.

"satire"?- there's a huge difference between a satirical cartoon and a 15 minute film which would leave 2 billion people around the world feel beyond offended. Political satires are always published in newspapers, to mock politicians, however i fear this is quite beyond that.

"Under the narrower guidelines, only speech that has the intent and the likelihood of inciting imminent violence or lawbreaking can be limited."- now don't tell me that the film didnt intend to bring about violence. Why would the producers send the film to the media in arab nations, as this...

How am i supporting the protest?

"private citizen"? lol . http://rt.com/usa/news/innocence-muslims-informant-nakoula-349/

Did the police really start pepperspraying people/unnecessarily confronting them before the protesters got violent?- umm yes. There was quite a lot of footage where, police had withdrawn their cans, and sprayed at the protesters, despite the protester making no apparent intent to move forward or...

"Isn't the Sharia punishment for blasphemy death?"- That's a grey area within islam. Some scholars agree to this, whilst several others don't. There is strong evidences which support both sides of the argument. As a personal opinion, i believe death isnt the correct punishment.

Its called "freedom of speech", not "freedom to hate"

What do you mean, " you guys". It was a minority of 500 people. Plus, a lot of the protesters are familiar to me, most are uneducated dropouts from punchbowl, belmore or granville boys.

@ Paki prince check your notifications

If u didn't realise, i did initially say that they wouldn't go to war to begin with, cos both sides would have a lot to loose.

I think otherwise. Why wouldn't they?

Just a point id like to make. If Pakistan and India entered war again, America and China would get involved too. Both India and Pakistan are equipped with nukes. I'm pretty sure both nations would decide against a war for the time being for it will only possibly lead to a WW3.

Ok, but then dont affiliate such anti-american feelings expresse by people in muslim countries with a religion. I think thats whats JINOUGA is trying to get at.

This blokes got it right.

"Pakistanis support China, not because they're Muslim (lol), but because China does not really get along with the US either." = +1 It's also because china can provide Pakistan with support if it were to enter a war with India or America.

Statistics from a news website is far more reliable than statistics from an anti islamic website whose main goal is to portray islam in a wrong manner.I think everyone would agree with me here.

Thank u

LOL. You actually think he was killed?