Search results

I'm having a bad day.... Shhh lol. > > > > > >

Also, I'll just say this on here.... I'm new to this site, but I get a strong vibe that people either say they did terrible or claim that they did wonderful attempting to 1 up the last person. Also, so many people take it so serious... I mean, a singular question whether worth 1 mark or 25 marks...

Quite old technology :/ I used many generalisations but identified 3d imaging as a way to recreate the appearance of people, as well as cropology which is hardly with the human remains unless they shat their pants upon death.

Oh... Okay... So you just h@Ck and BOS all day...

I assume that because you didn't reply with an answer you didn't find it very easy. But I'm not sure what everyone else is going on about, even with my screw up on the tomb question (I remembered tombs outside a gate from a documentary but thought it may have been from the Augustan age...

MEOW

What did you answer for the multiple choice on what Pompeii has but Herc. doesn't?

I screwed up the multiple choice question about the tomb... I didn't answer that it would have been outside the gate at Herc. I'm really angry about it, because as soon as I walked out I realised what I had done. Other than that I thought that it was a really easy exam...

Oh no...

The HSC markers generally look to award marks wherever they can. Almost any issue relating to human rights, whether a contemporary issue done in class such as slavery and human trafficking or not, most people should get 4 or 5 marks easily if they filled the space with slightly relevant information.

I can only speak for myself, but I attend class, read a news article every once and a while and do 1/2 of the worksheets I receive and I'll get a medium to high band 5 I'd imagine. Rather easy course that a lot of people think is hard...

I found parts of the exam okay and others hard. My study was quite bad though I think, I seemed to go really well with a lot of stuff people are saying was challenging, but screwed up some easy things due to not seeing the content for months or just not paying enough attention. Thank goodness...

You're a mean person, there is no need for it.... We are just having a conversation.

Gliza95, you're actually wrong too in saying that, as causation refers to the causal link between the action and the result as opposed to intent (with a guilty mind) to the crime. It has nothing to do with mens rea, causation in this case. Causation would have to do with the action of the person...

Well, more taking the piss regarding my retardation. I was overtly arguing what is wrong in an attempt to convince myself that I wasn't so wrong... Mind blank. I'm the type of person who screws the pooch in question 1 in MC but gets 90-95% for the exam itself.

Ignore me, I think I'm just trying to convince myself that I didn't make a silly mistake... It was one of those questions where I just saw it and coloured. I'd predict 16 or 17 :/

Explain why only actus reus? Causation... The dude sold it to the person, causing the person to have possession. Causation refers to the act taking place.

Question 4 was stupid because both actus reus and causation are correct. Well, regarding criminal law they should both be correct, as causation also refers to the act actually taking place... I went with causation, but I have a feeling it should have been actus reus... fuck.

My name is Mutant Kitty I do: English Adv SOR 2 Ancient History History Extension Legal Studies Business Studies NOTE: I avoided maths for ATAR reasons, I would have got 75-80 in mathematics and it wasn't worth it... Atar aim: 90 plus I have entry in UOW though, so all sweet :) Band 6 in...

I go to a school west of Sydney. 37 people entered for the first English exam. Like 20 remained at the end.