Search results

Fully agreed. Annuities can go fuck themselves and so can probability (extension probability as well that's not free of the hate). I would rather do 100 u-subs and rotations of solids of revolutions before ever doing a single financial math question again

Ext 1 was better than that shithole of a subject advanced maths could ever wish to be.

That is absolutely a prion. Misfolded proteins. + literally that image pops up when you search it up. CSSA tripping

I really hope you're right. Praying there's no meiosis/mitosis stuff I sort of understand it but it's gonna make me panic in the actual exam if it pops up.

Im rank 1 in bio too and I've got a great class. But man, I just want to perform well for myself so I don't end up having to get my final mark carried by someone else. I got 83 with minimal studying for trials as well but after studying so much for bio recently, I feel like I won't get any...

Looking over this thread I actually am very sure I did pretty well for the entire business paper save for the current ratio question of all things. I should have known 9:1 is way too good to be true for even the most exceptional of businesses but I cbf trying to remember what the exact current...

Screw that glad course is over never have to worry about bst again until I decide to do it on steroids in uni.

BRO IF THATS ACTUALLY WHAT 3 AND 4 ARE THATS FREE DUBS PLS BE RIGHT

Dw you got this I winged my business trial and got 70/100. Short answer and Business report might be the most painful parts but MCQ and extended response should be fine. I got 17 and 16 for mc and interdependence question but damn short answer 25 and report 12.

I fucking knew I'd do better in ext than advanced. Assuming mg like last year, should be getting 62-68%. Just pissed off about that one probability question though I tried using the binomial probability formula and got the greatest answer. "MATH ERROR". My bad for not studying it but it was only...

Same bro. I'm just here like I need to revise binomials and differential equations a bit more because I don't know them as well but I don't even care anymore atp. E4 or E1, it's not gonna end up affecting my ATAR very much.

I hope there's very little on binomial expansions and such. FUCK BINOMIALS FUCK E(X) FUCK PROBABILITY

6 year old video series but I doubt the syllabus has changed much if at all since its release. Hope it helps you and anyone else doing BST and not knowing where to start for revising.

Stupid Russia question got me messed up for foreign policy but rest was easy dubs

Hope those are what the middle two questions are that'd be so nice. But NESA is an evil, evil corporation that thrives off the tears of the masses.

Honestly I'm just taking a gamble for the national study/peace and conflict modules and memorising dot points for one entire half of each study (I.e for Russia I'm memorising Post Stalin and IndoChina 1964-1972). Generally the two questions asked will touch on both parts. Memorising main things...

Hope scaling is better. Counted and pretty sure I got 61 raw this was a horror show. But last year a 61 got 81 and last year was a fuckin breeze compared to this nightmare of an "advanced" hsc. Regardless I'm fine w/ a B5 for advanced after that.

Im so fucked for modern bro. Core and Civil is fine but I don't even know where to start for Indochina and USSR. So much that can be asked about and I know if I gamble and focus on some key aspects the two optional questions won't have shit to do with what I study

Fuck advanced and it's deceptively easy past papers that's how. I smashed last years past paper in 2 hours and this one I had like 4 entire blank questions by the end.

It's funny because I did significantly better in ext 1 trials than my adv. So extension might actually redeem my math score. God I fucking hate advanced