sure talent100 is good for showing what subjects are your best and worst, but ignore the actual atar it gives, cause it always seems too high
uac is by far most accurate cause they use the exact data used for atars, averaged from 5 years of scaling data
Can't agree more.
For those trying to workout what exact ATAR they got (post HSC), UAC is great.
However, for anyone trying to actually improve their ATAR (pre HSC of course): Identifying which subject/s is pulling them down, or which subject to work on lifting some marks in - Talent100 is the go to.
For example, if you're confident on getting a 94 in 3U maths, and currently on track to get a 87 in say PDHPE, then you shouldn't be spending all your time on 3U and trying to lift it to a 98. The time taken to improve from 94 to 98 in 3U will be far longer and harder, and it will even result in a lower ATAR than if you were to work more on PDHPE and lift it from an 87 to a 91.
Hope that makes sense.