For this question, this is how I would see it z and its conjugate gives 5 automatically this should tell us that , Now I suppose wither x=2, y=1 or x=1 and y=2. Here I see the fraction and oh look at this we need to rationalise the denominator and it is 5. After this, my attention goes towards and you know as a matter of fact there has to be something that gives us .
I reckon this should be . One little mistake yet a vital one.Let
It follows that
If
then
If
then (by multiplying using conjugates)
So
Finally, simulatenously solve and
I'll leave that final part as an exercise to you.
That's true, its' edited now.I reckon this should be . One little mistake yet a vital one.
I have another one slightly more difficult, part b please
View attachment 32903
This questionI have another one slightly more difficult, part b please
View attachment 32903
how did you get the -2Re(a)z term ?
ohh i get it because the conjugates are identical to the original, so its just z(2a), would you have to put Re(a) since it said the coefficents were real in the q?This question
Conjugates.
I mean you could do it algebraically to convince yourself.ohh i get it because the conjugates are identical to the original, so its just z(2a), would you have to put Re(a) since it said the coefficents were real in the q?
ohh i get, is it because re(a) is just a since that is the real component of a?I mean you could do it algebraically to convince yourself.
let a be a complex number, a+ib. a conjugate is simply a - ib.
a + ib + a - ib = 2a
and 2a is simply double the real component of a complex number, a + ib "2Re(a)". It would be considered a coefficient since you would have factored it from z.
ohh i get, is it because re(a) is just a since that is the real component of a?
ohh makes sense i got mixed up between a and alpha
if thats the case then try using x+iy or any other variables that are more distinguishable so you don't subconsciously interpret one variable as another unless specified.ohh makes sense i got mixed up between a and alpha
Yes, I wondered if that might be the case, hence my clarification after I noticed the definitionohh makes sense i got mixed up between a and alpha
let a be a complex number, a+ib. a conjugate is simply a - ib.
They're the same thing.i was also wondering why does z multiplied by its conjugate give the absolute value of z ^2, shouldn't it just be x^2 + y^2?