mrstripedshades
Active Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2015
- Messages
- 466
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2016
As someone that did both last year. I personally preferred Micro way more.
Micro had all of its lectures online, and I essentially crammed with Prashans. I got a good HD for Micro, my first one at uni. I got a D for Macro but that was my most minimal effort subject, I honestly probably failed the exam or just passed it, that subject I had legit next to no revision. I had nearly 100% in my assignments, which I found piss easy.
For me, one of them was a RBA group assignment report about the rba rate or whatever. Our presentation and even report wasnt perfect but EVERYONE got 100% even the guy who didnt talk whatsoever, whether that was about the tutor or what I dont know. The other one was meant to be an interview which they actually wanted you to conduct on someone regarding some economic situation. I just did it on the pricing market and used an older friends name and answered what hes told me before in conversations.
Econ111 made me disinterested, jefferey sheen to me wasnt a good lecturer. He went on about minimal details that had no relevance to the course structure or what is examined (which is realistically what most students care about, especially if its a compulsory unit). The maths component was much more in it, as in there were several equations. you could easily opt to choose to do theory questions instead in the final though.
Econ110 math is general maths level or even like year 8 or something. its literally just shapes
Micro had all of its lectures online, and I essentially crammed with Prashans. I got a good HD for Micro, my first one at uni. I got a D for Macro but that was my most minimal effort subject, I honestly probably failed the exam or just passed it, that subject I had legit next to no revision. I had nearly 100% in my assignments, which I found piss easy.
For me, one of them was a RBA group assignment report about the rba rate or whatever. Our presentation and even report wasnt perfect but EVERYONE got 100% even the guy who didnt talk whatsoever, whether that was about the tutor or what I dont know. The other one was meant to be an interview which they actually wanted you to conduct on someone regarding some economic situation. I just did it on the pricing market and used an older friends name and answered what hes told me before in conversations.
Econ111 made me disinterested, jefferey sheen to me wasnt a good lecturer. He went on about minimal details that had no relevance to the course structure or what is examined (which is realistically what most students care about, especially if its a compulsory unit). The maths component was much more in it, as in there were several equations. you could easily opt to choose to do theory questions instead in the final though.
Econ110 math is general maths level or even like year 8 or something. its literally just shapes