Last edited:
When you do working in 2u make sure to write out obvious statements, they may seem stupid but they are necessary to get the marks, particularly for curve sketching. For example above- include in your working a phrase like "testing nature," and a concluding statement "therefore horizontal point of inflexion at P(X,Y) etc.Im going to Year 10 in 2018 and am learning differential calculus, to answer OP's question I sketched the graph, any advanced criticism is appreciated as I am learning
It doesn't matter if your graph's scale isn't perfect, you don't need to measure out centimetres on your ruler. As long as you sketch a reasonable graph, showing any necessary features (including any that were asked for) e.g. intercepts, maxima/minima, pts. of inflexion you'll get the marks. The intent is not to test you on your measuring skills.Im going to Year 10 in 2018 and am learning differential calculus, to answer OP's question I sketched the graph, any advanced criticism is appreciated as I am learning
Just a tiny tiny comment but make sure your horizontal point of inflection looks really horizontal so that if you drew a tangent to it the tangent would be horizontal.It doesn't matter if your graph's scale isn't perfect, you don't need to measure out centimetres on your ruler. As long as you sketch a reasonable graph, showing any necessary features (including any that were asked for) e.g. intercepts, maxima/minima, pts. of inflexion you'll get the marks. The intent is not to test you on your measuring skills.
Just as a quick example, I would sketch it something like this. Just note that this graph shows the y-intercept more clearly. It's possible to find any x intercepts but this isn't expected in the 2U course, although it should be in the 3U course. I was taught to label my points of inflexion with a line going through the point but I don't think it matters as long as you make it clear that the point IS one of inflexion. In an exam I would draw the graph larger, though.
A point of inflexion means a change in concavity, i.e. from positive to negative or vice versa. so to prove that a point is one of inflexion, you need to show that the sign of the second derivative changes around that point.
for your curve:
Because changes signs around , a point of inflexion exists at .
Just to elaborate on why you need to test the second derivative around the point - first note that any quadratic, such as , has no points of inflexion because is always a constant (in this case, ) and so the equation has no solution.
Consider the curve . The curvature of the graph is identical to (you can graph it digitally to check). Here, , so the equation has a solution at . But from the previous paragraph, clearly this curve can't have a point of inflexion. This is because for all real , so the second derivative never changes signs and because of this, no points of inflexion exist on this curve.
I asked my teacher he says about 3mm run in HPOI is goodJust a tiny tiny comment but make sure your horizontal point of inflection looks really horizontal so that if you drew a tangent to it the tangent would be horizontal.