UNSW chit chat thread (1 Viewer)

[Flop21]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

you guys think a wam between 78-79 is competitive enough for ipt to law? im aware of supply and demand, just want to know what you guys think.

possibly

 

[malcolm21]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

you guys think a wam between 87-98 is competitive enough for law to ipt? im aware of demand and supply, just want to know what you guys think.

 

[strawberrye]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

you guys think a wam between 87-98 is competitive enough for law to ipt? im aware of demand and supply, just want to know what you guys think.

Wow that's really hard to have such a significant difference in WAM in one term.... but yes, any WAM within that range-you will be guaranteed IPT to law.

 

[packpig123]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

fuck if you dont get the required wam to stay in adv sci (70) for a semester does that mean you drop to science the start of second year without any chances of staying in adv

 

[Squar3root]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

fuck if you dont get the required wam to stay in adv sci (70) for a semester does that mean you drop to science the start of second year without any chances of staying in adv

Yes. They transfer you out of the degree

Advanced Science is about people who can maintain a high academic standard and if you can't get a 70 WAM, you're clearly not the candidate that's meant to be there

 

[strawberrye]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

fuck if you dont get the required wam to stay in adv sci (70) for a semester does that mean you drop to science the start of second year without any chances of staying in adv

Yep, that is a high credit or thereabouts, which should be expected as advanced science guarantees an honours year which only usually for people who are genuinely dedicated to want to pursue research/or at least that interest in uni (and it is quite logical if you want to display your genuine dedication to be entitled to be in honours year without applying for it, then you are likely to have to demonstrate a certain degree of academic commitment.

 

[Jaabs96]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

Thomas Sowell's basic economics book worth a read?

thoughts?

 

[iforgotmyname]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

yes
As renegade said:




srs

Been through it myself


This is at unsw idk for other universities

Yeah, the pass mark for phys1A sem 1 was actually lower than 50, a lot of people still got supps

 

[-Senpai]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

How did people find ACCT1B exam?

The last paper syndrome is hitting me hard rn

 

[Mr_Kap]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

Yes. They transfer you out of the degree

Advanced Science is about people who can maintain a high academic standard and if you can't get a 70 WAM, you're clearly not the candidate that's meant to be there

yeh Im def being trasnfered to science/comp sci. Maths is actually so shit, will just pass.
probs will get 85ish in chem1041, 93-96 in phys1111, 70's in comp1927, and like 52 in math1231. So unless i can pull a miracle in comp1927 next week I'll be dropped

 

[RenegadeMx]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

yeh Im def being trasnfered to science/comp sci. Maths is actually so shit, will just pass.
probs will get 85ish in chem1041, 93-96 in phys1111, 70's in comp1927, and like 52 in math1231. So unless i can pull a miracle in comp1927 next week I'll be dropped

ur fault for neglecting it

 

[matchalolz]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

How did people find ACCT1B exam?

The last paper syndrome is hitting me hard rn

It was alright but some questions were so specific??

I wanted to hit HD but idk how I went because I finished right on time and didn't check anything

 

[leehuan]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

It was alright but some questions were so specific??

I wanted to hit HD but idk how I went because I finished right on time and didn't check anything

You actually found it alright...

 

[matchalolz]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

You actually found it alright...

Idk I feel like I should have gotten a distinction overall at least which is great for me. Inb4 rekt [emoji24]

How did you find it?

 

[kawaiipotato]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

It was alright but some questions were so specific??

I wanted to hit HD but idk how I went because I finished right on time and didn't check anything

Did you guess a lot? I found myself guessing a couple in the multiple choice haha I don't think i did too well in the exam

 

[matchalolz]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

Did you guess a lot? I found myself guessing a couple in the multiple choice haha I don't think i did too well in the exam

Yeah, I definitely guessed quite a few but I do that for every exam lmao [emoji23] [emoji23]

 

[leehuan]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

Idk I feel like I should have gotten a distinction overall at least which is great for me. Inb4 rekt [emoji24]

How did you find it?

It was supposed to be my free HD. So much for that idea.

 

[kawaiipotato]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

It was supposed to be my free HD. So much for that idea.

Snakes are elongated, legless, carnivorous reptiles of the suborder Serpentes[2] that can be distinguished from legless lizards by their lack of eyelids and external ears. Like all squamates, snakes are ectothermic, amniote vertebrates covered in overlapping scales. Many species of snakes have skulls with several more joints than their lizard ancestors, enabling them to swallow prey much larger than their heads with their highly mobile jaws.

 

[leehuan]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

Snakes are elongated, legless, carnivorous reptiles of the suborder Serpentes[2] that can be distinguished from legless lizards by their lack of eyelids and external ears. Like all squamates, snakes are ectothermic, amniote vertebrates covered in overlapping scales. Many species of snakes have skulls with several more joints than their lizard ancestors, enabling them to swallow prey much larger than their heads with their highly mobile jaws.

...wow

 

[matchalolz]

Re: UNSW chit chat thread 2016

...wow

I'm sure you'll do fine!!