Theres a more recent one from 2013 floating around somewhere on google, if you type in the correct thing that has essentially the same stats. Though thats around when they introduced a new policy where they actually weren't allowed to use scaling for any subjects. Whereas i know at UNSW they scale the advanced subjects quite regularly and sometimes the regular/lower streams down. For science/math that is.
It's scaling for the higher versions of certain courses, not 'advanced' courses. Not all advanced courses have both a higher and normal version. Both versions are graded together, which means it's quite normal for the higher version to be scaled appropriately. Please don't make it sound like UNSW just bumps everyone's marks up by like 20%. That doesn't happen. If scaling occurs, it's rarely done by the course convener. It's done by a committee who scrutinises the assessments and exams to ensure the marks were appropriately awarded. In most courses, your final mark is your raw mark.
yeah what realise said, the medal systems a bit different from UNSW, since they list medals based on specific subjects while USYD lists it on degrees, so some subject areas might not even get medals but it looks like UNSW just gives it regardless to the most distinguished person in the fields.
No, UNSW awards based on the degree, just like USYD. In this context, the medal for pure mathematics was actually a medal for adv mathematics where the student's major was in pure mathematics. If their major was applied, then it would have said applied. Another example is the student who got a medal in Business Economics. Their medal was the commerce medal, but their major was business economics. Only 1 commerce student received a medal. They are the most distinguished students in each
program, not each major.