The point I was trying to make is that maybe the issue isnt that serious. I mean, as I said earlier in the thread, I do think Maths needs to be changed, but ultimately, I dont think it will have a significant impact on the nation's performance in key areas.
I agree to some extent, but I think people vary according to natural ability. I tutored Maths for 5 years and I specialised in struggling and below average students (by state standards, not BoS standards). I remember having year 8 students who struggled with percentages and another who could not tell analogue time. True, the students hadn't been well taught and they lacked foundations due to the fact that they werent really focused on school as some others. But I noticed a great difference in ability between some of my students. Some had the potential to do higher level maths, others really were barely capable of General.
Enoilgam, for your first paragraph, I think people (kids) need to start learning maths as early as 3 years old and as this progresses, they will have no further difficulty in the future
Could not tell what analogue time was??? He's got serious issues (not even joking). I think those who weren't capable of general haven't learnt their basics properly (like I said originally) but seriously, if you're not capable of general maths, you've got serious issues. How can people even get 50% in a general maths test? I don't get this logic here?
The maths curriculum in Australia is really based on anything that'll be useful in society (i.e. trigonometry, logarithms, calculus, probability, rates and ratio, unitary method, consumer arithmetic,etc) and not so much on what's difficult (like how asian countries base it around that) as opposed to asian countries