MedVision ad

MATH2111 Higher Several Variable Calculus (2 Viewers)

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: Multivariable Calculus

Cool. Ok this one is twisting with me but here's my attempt





 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Re: Multivariable Calculus

Yep sweet, was about to post that.
__________________________

Last question of this bundle:







There might be an accidental typo
Isn't the question asking for

Apart from that it seems fine, although the notation and seems a bit odd especially it seems a bit inconsistent, the first one is evaluated at the function value f(u,v) I think and the second in evaluated at f(u,v) as well.
and the last one is just not the same as the first one, evaluated at (u,v)?.
 
Last edited:

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: Multivariable Calculus

Isn't the question asking for

Apart from that it seems fine, although the notation and seems a bit odd.
It is, my bad.

I'm just using notation I was presented with just now
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: Multivariable Calculus

I used subscript numerals for the notation because otherwise it'd be more confusing due to so many variables being present.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: Multivariable Calculus

Is this correct







 
Last edited:

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: Multivariable Calculus

Is this correct







I think you lost a factor of 2 in your second line in the part where you're finding a second derivative (the 2 in front of the ∂z/∂y), but the method is right. (Or maybe you typo'ed it and left it out but did the remaining parts right, haven't checked it too closely.)
 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Re: Multivariable Calculus

I think you lost a factor of 2 in your second line in the part where you're finding a second derivative (the 2 in front of the ∂z/∂y), but the method is right. (Or maybe you typo'ed it and left it out but did the remaining parts right, haven't checked it too closely.)
Does he need to say that f is smooth (in )
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: Multivariable Calculus

Does he need to say that f is smooth (in )
Well yeah it does need to be smooth enough so that we can switch the order of the mixed partials (which doesn't require C-infinity). But that was probably an implicit assumption of the question.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: Multivariable Calculus



Progress so far


___________

 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: Multivariable Calculus

Fix x and y, differentiate with respect to t (using the chain rule to deal with the LHS differentiation), and then set t=1 in the resulting identity.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: Multivariable Calculus

Hang on, just one final bit that I don't compute (I think it's just a dumb moment)

Explicitly:

If I use the chain rule on this without the t=1 bit treating u=tx and v=ty



Obviously when t=1, f(u,v)=f(x,y), but I can't justify it in my head why the partial f/partial u becomes partial f/partial x. I just need confirmation that this was an allowed step you used?
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: Multivariable Calculus

Think about what partial f/partial u means, it just means the derivative of the function with respect to the first variable (and you can replace u with x or whatever your favorite greek letter is). You are differentiating f with respect to its first variable and then evaluating it at the coordinates (x,y).

Try to convince yourself that


and


are the same functions, just with different "dummy variables".

Introducing things like u and v can be more hassle than help.

This is also an example of why some people prefer using numerical subscripts for a function to denote differentiation with respect to the j-th variable.
 
Last edited:

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: Multivariable Calculus

Hm ok yep.
__________________
A lot of the question is omitted for me to have a go at myself


No idea at all how to apply what here.
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: Multivariable Calculus

Hm ok yep.
__________________
A lot of the question is omitted for me to have a go at myself


No idea at all how to apply what here.
You can't use the standard definition of the inverse tangent function, because θ can be anything from -π to π.

For that, you need to use a slightly trickier modification, known as atan2(y,x)

Let α be the principle arctangent of y/x

then atan2(y,x)
= α if x is positive
= α+π if x is negative and y is non-negative
= α-π if x and y are negative
= π/2 if x=0 and y is positive
= -π/2 if x=0 and y is negative
= undefined if x=y=0

Since r is positive, there is no trouble there, as it is simply your standard absolute distance using Pythagoras's Theorem.
 
Last edited:

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: Multivariable Calculus

Hm ok yep.
__________________
A lot of the question is omitted for me to have a go at myself


No idea at all how to apply what here.
Do you know how to differentiate x and y as functions of r and theta?

Once you have the differential/Jacobian of the map (r,theta)->(x,y) (which will be a 2x2 matrix), just invert this matrix to get the differential of the inverse map.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top