Ah right.
In that case another question. Obviously I can look at a removable discontinuity and jump discontinuity and distinguish between the two. In the exam how would I describe the difference though?
Would it be that whilst f(a) neq limit, the left and right limits are equal -> removable?
Sorry what I said about 'not necessarily undefined' was actually in reference to 'jump discontinuity', got my terms mixed up.
To distinguish between a removable discontinuity and another discontinuity (jump or essential), the former type is one where the function can be defined at the point in such a way that the function will be continuous there then.
E.g. If f: R -> R, f(x) = (x^2 -1)/(x-1) for x =/= 1, and f(1) = 3 has a removable discontinuity at x=1. It is a discontinuity, but removable because we can redefine f(1) = 2 and then you can show that f is continuous at 1.
To show that a point is an essential discontinuity or jump discontinuity, basically show it satisfies the definition of it. E.g. to show a is an essential continuity (where a is a point in the domain of f and f is also defined in some neighbourhood of a, so that limits to a will make sense), it'd suffice to show that one of the left or right hand limits as x -> a of f(x) does not exist or is infinite.