MedVision ad

HSC 2016 MX1 Marathon - Harder 3U Integration (archive) (1 Viewer)

KINGOM 885

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Messages
17
Gender
Male
HSC
2019
This thread is for interesting integrals or derivatives or integrals and derivatives that you need help with. The only rules are that you must keep this to harder 3U and every question must be answered before a new one is asked. Here is one to start you off,
differentiate y= 7^ln(x) with respect to x
 

Nailgun

Cole World
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2,193
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX1 Calculus Marathon 2016

This thread is for interesting integrals or derivatives or integrals and derivatives that you need help with. The only rules are that you must keep this to harder 3U and every question must be answered before a new one is asked. Here is one to start you off,
differentiate y= 7^ln(x) with respect to x
erm no offence but this is a 2U question and not a very hard one at that lele

 

jathu123

Active Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
357
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
Re: MX1 Calculus Marathon 2016



I'm not sure if this is the correct way of doing it though
 

Nailgun

Cole World
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2,193
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX1 Calculus Marathon 2016



edit: oops ninjaed
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX1 Calculus Marathon 2016

This seems boring...

 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX1 Calculus Marathon 2016

Chain rule method is easy to use for the above derivative however I'm going to assume a result that you can't assume in the HSC

d/dx 7^ln(x)
= ln(7).7^ln(x).1/x

Assumed: d/dx a^x = a^x.ln(a)
 

Nailgun

Cole World
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2,193
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX1 Calculus Marathon 2016

Chain rule method is easy to use for the above derivative however I'm going to assume a result that you can't assume in the HSC

d/dx 7^ln(x)
= ln(7).7^ln(x).1/x

Assumed: d/dx a^x = a^x.ln(a)
wait you can't assume this lol?
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX1 Calculus Marathon 2016

wait you can't assume this lol?
Fortunately I am yet to seen an exam paper that actually asks you to take the derivative of a^x.

However, as the HSC gets further and further dumbed down, at least since the year 2010 (and of course actual HSC papers to 2001) I have not seen any strict mention to the fact that d/dx a^x = a^x.ln(x) is an assumed result. The syllabus is so outdated I don't bother with it.

Proof of the result:
d/dx a^x
= d/dx e^(ln(a^x)) - true as a^x>0 for all x in R
= d/dx e^(x.ln(a))
= ln(a).e^(x.ln(a))
reverse the steps
= ln(a).a^x
 

KINGOM 885

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Messages
17
Gender
Male
HSC
2019
Re: MX1 Calculus Marathon 2016

That is correct. I personally made x the subject and used dx/dy to differentiate before reverting to dy/dx.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX1 Calculus Marathon 2016

Pretty sure you can assume it. The proof is only a few lines anyway, it wouldn't hurt to chuck it in
I meant to say that you can assume it aah
Never recommended as whilst the old syllabus still has it, it is never explicitly taught.

In the HSC: Remember the proof using e^(ln.c) = c to derive it. Like porcupinetree stated, its basically a 2 line proof.

Fortunately, it is not really examined these days either. This means its not a massive worry
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top