No, it is the international standard for raising logarithmic functions to arbitrary powers. Most number theory papers, that I've seen, that have exponentiated logarithms, use it.WolframAlpha uses it, but I never see it anywhere else. So is this technically incorrect notation?
Have no clue why I've never come across this anymore.No, it is the international standard for raising logarithmic functions to arbitrary powers. Most number theory papers, that I've seen, that have exponentiated logarithms, use it.
Iterated Logarithms are a different matter entirely.
Pretty sure the function of a function notation was something along the lines of f bullet f(x).It depends on the context you're working in. Sometimes it's useful for , other times for . Neither is more correct than the other. Additionally, usually represents the inverse function, rather than the reciprocal of the function. usually represents the nth derivative when n is positive, and the nth primitive when n is negative, and the function itself when n is 0.