Surely there is another way rather than a compound angle formula for inverse sine right? Cause that would require a derivation beforehand
The question is intrinsically lacking in difficulty. What it does contain is terminology, which is severely neglected in the current curriculum.You really should tone down the question difficulty a bit when you're outside the 4U marathons. I don't think any of the 3U kids know what that actually is.
"Lattice points" is a standard mathematical term. But I agree that if this question came up in the HSC (unlikely in itself these days), instead of saying "lattice points", they would probably explain it (by saying "integer coordinates" or something), and maybe even provide a diagram like the one I linked above.I could tell the difficulty was absolutely fine. These are just average 12th grade students though; there are hardly any places in the world where such terminology is required.
Mathematicians are nitpicky.I could tell the difficulty was absolutely fine. These are just average 12th grade students though; there are hardly any places in the world where such terminology is required.
There needs to be a single quick topic in the current one labelled : TerminologyWhen I meant hardly any places, I meant any places in the world in their 11th/12th/13th grade curriculum.
Part of why I even want to do maths at uni is to extend above these simplistic questions. But without the explanations, no assumptions should be made that a person who's basically just leaving behind childhood is capable of interpreting language themselves, or to research it lol
I think LaTeX is just messing up on this site, it happens once in a while.Not sure what has happened but I have tried accessing your link but can't read it from 2 computers (a uni) and my mac book (which I use regularly)