integral95
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2012
- Messages
- 779
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2013
On the first turn, do we choose a specific card to turn face down? (hence there are different ways to win)A one-player card game is played by placing 13 cards (Ace through King in that order) in a circle. Initially all the cards are face-up and the objective of the game is to flip them face-down. However, a card can only be flipped face-down if another card that is '3 cards away' is face-up. For example, one can only flip the Queen face-down if either the 9 or the 2 (or both) are face-up. A player wins the game if they can flip all but one of the cards face-down. Given that the cards are distinguishable, find the number of ways it is possible to win the game.
I think you can choose any card as long as it meets the conditions to be flipped.On the first turn, do we choose a specific card to turn face down? (hence there are different ways to win)
I've found the source for your question, and I don't understand their solution. Do you?A one-player card game is played by placing 13 cards (Ace through King in that order) in a circle. Initially all the cards are face-up and the objective of the game is to flip them face-down. However, a card can only be flipped face-down if another card that is '3 cards away' is face-up. For example, one can only flip the Queen face-down if either the 9 or the 2 (or both) are face-up. A player wins the game if they can flip all but one of the cards face-down. Given that the cards are distinguishable, find the number of ways it is possible to win the game.
Yea I think I do. I wouldn't be able to come up with that in an exam though. Which part didn't you understand?I've found the source for your question, and I don't understand their solution. Do you?
Doubt this question would be in the exam, and if it were, there'd be guiding steps as sub-parts of the question.Yea I think I do. I wouldn't be able to come up with that in an exam though. Which part didn't you understand?
True. It was from a math tournament.Doubt this question would be in the exam, and if it were, there'd be guiding steps as sub-parts of the question.
If I blindly accept the following two statements, then the calculation itself is fine. But they are not obvious to me.Yea I think I do. I wouldn't be able to come up with that in an exam though. Which part didn't you understand?
(1) I understood this part by actually testing it out. I'll refer to flipping as crossing out on the circle. I drew up the circle, crossed out the top card (the Ace on my circle) and then the one on the right (4). I then made an isolated card by skipping the third card (7) and crossing out the fourth (10). If you continue crossing out all cards clockwise, you eventually reach the Jack which can't be crossed out as it becomes isolated after the 8 and Ace are crossed out. So we end up with two isolated cards, i.e. we've lost the game. I'd imagine there would be similar endings if the isolated card was made on the 4th, 5th, ..., 11th turns. Not sure how to prove this non-empirically though.If I blindly accept the following two statements, then the calculation itself is fine. But they are not obvious to me.
(1) Similarly, the game cannot be won if an isolated card is created on the 3rd, 4th, 5th, ..., 11th turn.
(2) This is because any subsequent card must be one chosen from the two cards on either side of the 'face-down block' (otherwise more than one isolated card is created).
But in (1), you have only jumped three at a time (or multipled of three at a time). How do you test out a more random selection?(1) I understood this part by actually testing it out. I'll refer to flipping as crossing out on the circle. I drew up the circle, crossed out the top card (the Ace on my circle) and then the one on the right (4). I then made an isolated card by skipping the third card (7) and crossing out the fourth (10). If you continue crossing out all cards clockwise, you eventually reach the Jack which can't be crossed out as it becomes isolated after the 8 and Ace are crossed out. So we end up with two isolated cards, i.e. we've lost the game. I'd imagine there would be similar endings if the isolated card was made on the 4th, 5th, ..., 11th turns. Not sure how to prove this non-empirically though.
(2) The isolated card must be made last to win the game. To do this, we have to pick the cards such that the flipped over cards are all next to each other. If we don't, what happened in (1) will happen, meaning we don't win the game.
If you draw the circle as the question suggests ("13 cards (Ace through King in that order) in a circle."), you could try a random selection. For example, starting at the top (Ace) and skipping every second card (2, 4, 6, ...) so that we have every first flipped over (A, 3, 5, ...). You can go around until you reach the 4, which is isolated as the Ace and 7 have been flipped over. At this point, all the remaining cards are isolated (correct me if I'm wrong here, may have made a mistake in my working).But in (1), you have only jumped three at a time (or multipled of three at a time). How do you test out a more random selection?
Oh, and for claim (2) here, it follows from the induction proof above; if we choose a card that is not one of the ones adjacent to the 'face-down block', then we create two chains of adjacent face-up cards (each with length > 0) in between two face-down ones, each of which we proved always results in the creation of an isolated card, and so two isolated cards will be created, which we don't want.If I blindly accept the following two statements, then the calculation itself is fine. But they are not obvious to me.
(1) Similarly, the game cannot be won if an isolated card is created on the 3rd, 4th, 5th, ..., 11th turn.
(2) This is because any subsequent card must be one chosen from the two cards on either side of the 'face-down block' (otherwise more than one isolated card is created).
360.The number of different arrangements of the letters of the word REGISTER which begin and end with letter R is:
I thought about it the wrong way. This was a MCQ from Girraween High School ( I have never heard of their school) trials but I would have treated the R as times 2 since the R could be in either positions (front or back or in reverse order)
The R's are identical, so having reverse order results in the same word. If the letters to go on the end were non-identical (e.g. A and B), then we would need to account for both orders if asked for how many words are possible with A and B at the endpoints.I thought about it the wrong way. This was a MCQ from Girraween High School ( I have never heard of their school) trials but I would have treated the R as times 2 since the R could be in either positions (front or back or in reverse order)
So the lesson from this is they have to be in 'fixed positions'