Question is a little ambiguous, but i'm guessing what it's getting at, is if you had an equilibrium, the effect of temperature will depend on whether the reaction is exo/endothermic and if you had a specific ion in the equilibria, adding more of that ion (increasing concentration) will shift to remove some of those ions and that will depend on the value of the equilibrium constants.
+1, my bad ahaha. Assumed OP was a 2016'er doing the water topic in prelim (prolly cos of the title)
Yiis, so a (slightly) more indepth explanation of Librah's answer is that when an equilibrium encounters a temperature, pressure or concentration change (generally we talk about those three factors) it will react according to Le Chatelier's Principle. LCP states that an equilibrium will shift to minimize the effects of a disturbance. Therefore if you increase the temperature, the equilibrium would shift to
lower the temperature, thus favouring the endothermic reaction (because that will absorb heat.) Likewise, if you decrease the temperature, the equilibrium would want to increase the temperature and thus favouring the exothermic reaction.
An equilibrium is a state when the forward and backward reactions (not not all chemical reactions are equilibriums) occur at equal rates. When this happens there will be no discernible change to the system despite chemical reactions/ collisions still occuring.
As for the increasing ion thingo:
If the equilibrium involves a specific ion and you add more of said ion (aka increase concentration of that ion), then by Le Chatelier's Principle, the equilibrium would shift to decrease the ion concentration. This means the equilibrium will shift to favour the forward or backward reaction that uses the ion as a reactants. (decreasing concnetration by using up some of that ion).
Also note that the equilibrium will never be able to completely counter the disturbance, it can only
minimize it. For example if we're talking about temperatures and you drop the temp. from 300K (at equilibrium) to 273K, the equilibrium can't ever bring it back to 300K, but it could probably shift to hit a new equilibrium of 290K.
To OP: If my initial hunch was right and you're actually in prelim, don't worry about this lol.