• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2015 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

integrand got the lower bound ages ago if you want to look for it by fowarding to when the question was posted
I think that's with seanieg's question
 

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

why not
EDIT: shit...
Don't worry ... it still works for both cases. But not considering that is one mark off in an exam! ... unless there is another method which bypasses the issue.
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Don't worry ... it still works for both cases. But not considering that is one mark off in an exam!
I made the answer based on the 1-c^2=s^2 fact so wouldnt that also make the answer wrong
 

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

I made the answer based on the 1-c^2=s^2 fact so wouldnt that also make the answer wrong
Inverse tan and sine are both odd functions.

So (ignoring all the extraneous rubbish):

2/sin(-α) times arctan sin(-α) = ....... ?
 

glittergal96

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
418
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

I wasn't able to think of a way to approximate the lower bound as (though technically if you allow for a strict lower bound like 2pi as an answer to the question, then a strict lower bound of 1 would be sufficient too and easy to prove, though such a bound would not be useful).

How did you get it?
You don't need to find a lower bound of sqrt(2*pi) though, I just asked for any positive constant in my original question.

So to summarise, if Q(n) is the quotient in the middle.

i) Show there are positive constants A,B such that A < Q(n) < B for all n. (My original question. You found a B, using the trapezoidal approximation, but can you find an A?)

ii) Show that Q(n) is monotone. (I just did this roughly, but I think it's not too hard.)

iii) Since the first two parts show that Q(n) -> c, you may assume this. Can you then find c? (This is distinct from i), you don't have to do it in an immediate sandwiching way, that sounds impossibly hard. Fortunately calculus gives us pretty powerful tools for computing things, especially when we don't have to worry about convergence!)
 

glittergal96

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
418
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

integrand got the lower bound ages ago if you want to look for it by fowarding to when the question was posted
That was to seanieg89's question (I think an upper bound). And in the end, that exponent turned out to be the wrong one, so Integrand's bound wasn't very sharp. (Not that what he did was wrong.)
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

That was to seanieg89's question (I think an upper bound). And in the end, that exponent turned out to be the wrong one, so Integrand's bound wasn't very sharp . (Not that what he did was wrong.)
Pun intended ? sean said he was right tho ?
 

glittergal96

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
418
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Pun intended ? sean said he was right tho ?
What pun? lol.

As I said in brackets, the thing he wrote down wasn't untrue, it is just weaker than the result we can prove. Sean's original question was "wrong" in that the upper bound was easy to prove and the lower bound was hard to prove (impossible in fact, because it wasn't true lol). If you add 1 to both of the exponents the question makes sense though. (See my recent proof).
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Just gonna do one case. Assume sin(α)>0







NEXT QUESTION:
I've seen this done already using indefinite integrals. But definite integrals seem to make things more fun and relaxing.

 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

NEXT QUESTION:
I've seen this done already using indefinite integrals. But definite integrals seem to make things more fun and relaxing.

The latter integral was solved on the first page of this marathon (three different approaches are there).
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Just gonna do one case. Assume sin(α)>0







NEXT QUESTION:
I've seen this done already using indefinite integrals. But definite integrals seem to make things more fun and relaxing.

i)







ii)
EDIT: notsure how to fix this latex
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

i)







ii)
EDIT: notsure how to fix this latex
Oh dear. But I'll take the 2I = \Int 0 part and say yeah you got it.

Whilst I'm here. Mega oh dear at the other comment.
EDIT: Yeah I figured you saw that.
 
Last edited:

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Oh dear. But I'll take the 2I = \Int 0 part and say yeah you got it.

Whilst I'm here. Mega oh dear at the other comment.
Im using dummy variables i need to add the first I and the last I to let it =0 otherwise you lose a mark for fudging...
 

glittergal96

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
418
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

You don't need to find a lower bound of sqrt(2*pi) though, I just asked for any positive constant in my original question.

So to summarise, if Q(n) is the quotient in the middle.

i) Show there are positive constants A,B such that A < Q(n) < B for all n. (My original question. You found a B, using the trapezoidal approximation, but can you find an A?)

ii) Show that Q(n) is monotone. (I just did this roughly, but I think it's not too hard.)

iii) Since the first two parts show that Q(n) -> c, you may assume this. Can you then find c? (This is distinct from i), you don't have to do it in an immediate sandwiching way, that sounds impossibly hard. Fortunately calculus gives us pretty powerful tools for computing things, especially when we don't have to worry about convergence!)
So did you end up having a proof that the Q(n) is bounded below by 1 Sy?

My upper bound (for the log sum) came from the trapezoidal approximation (and the geometric observation that this approximation underestimates the integral of a concave function.)

My lower bound I did in a couple of ways.

i) We can in fact overestimate the integral of a concave function by integrating its tangent curve. A convenient (and in fact optimal, which you can test with differential calculus) way of bounding is by using the tangent at . If we then perform the integration of this tangent line (ie calculate the area of a trapezium lol), we get log(a+1/2). This is a tight enough upper bound to be able to sum such approximations and get an appropriate lower bound for the logsum.

ii) We can study the trapezoidal approximation in a little more detail (wish we learned this in high school). Try to find a bound for the error of the trapezoidal approximation on in terms of Then this means the trapezoidal bound is good enough, as we can overestimate the logintegral by (its trapezoidal sum) + (a partial sum of the basel series). Knowing that the latter is finite is good enough to get a lower bound for the logsum.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top