Rhinoz8142
Well-Known Member
illiuminatii brah.was looking at raw mark database
70 raw in 2009 was 86
78 raw in 2013 was 86
wat
anyway do u think raw for 69-75 ?
illiuminatii brah.was looking at raw mark database
70 raw in 2009 was 86
78 raw in 2013 was 86
wat
Bio is marked harsher than eco most likely.Are you serious? So 83 raw yields a 90 exam mark?eco scales much higher and like raw 84-85 in eco is usually a 90, so I'm thinking for bio it should be around raw 86-87? Otherwise that's very strange :/
True. Does bio actually align badly or something?Bio is marked harsher than eco most likely.
All sciences are brutal
I can't imagine a worse criteria for marking than chem :/Marking criteria for bio is the worst.
The scaling isn't that great unless you do wellTrue. Does bio actually align badly or something?
one of my friends do chem, he said it was not bad as bio.
And he does bio as well
Oh wow :/The scaling isn't that great unless you do well