i don't think you have to add more of the alkanol. All it does it shift equilibrium to the right, but it's not cost effective.To shift equilibrium fwd you mean!!
Actually yes that's right!To shift equilibrium fwd you mean!!
why do you say that?I could have sworn that seventhroot did not do chem for HSC..but I might be wrong lol
Explanation please.Correct
Guys SEVENTHROOT DID NOT DO CHEMISTRY. HE IS A TROLL.
His too good for chem that's y your saying this.Correct
Guys SEVENTHROOT DID NOT DO CHEMISTRY. HE IS A TROLL.
Got D. Tried to work out where I went wrong for a solid 10 minutes. Realised at some point I decided to swap from using milligrams to using grams. Band 6 student.Solutions containing nickel (II) ions were analysed by AAS. A standard solution of
5 ppm nickel had an absorbance of 0.200. A second solution of unknown
concentration was found to have an absorbance of 0.500.
100 mL of this second solution was reacted with excess sodium carbonate solution.
The precipitate formed was weighed and dried.
What mass of precipitate formed?
(A) 2.5 x 10^-3
(B) 1.3 x 10^-3
(C) 1.7 g
(D) 2.5 g
yes I did;Correct
Guys SEVENTHROOT DID NOT DO CHEMISTRY. HE IS A TROLL.
Several Stages -Industrial (Contact process): Did you guys learn about the several stages (the multiple layers of V2O5 catalyst and how each one has a dif temp condition) during the conversion of 2SO2 + O2 <--> 2SO3? Or did you learn that it was just simply in one step
have you done all the 2013 ones?Does anyone have any 2014 papers that they could upload or message me? Will be appreciated.
The conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide is an equilibrium reaction, involving a fine delicate balance between a set of compromise conditions which maximise the yield at the smallest cost possible. 2SO2(g) + O2(g) (equilibrium) 2SO3(g) + heat. (catalyst = vanadium oxide). Increasing the temperature or the pressure of the reaction vessel increases the rate of reaction as it provides more kinetic energy for successful collisions between particles to occur. However, increasing temperature, causes equilibrium to shift to the left, favouring the reverse reaction, producing more of the reactants and thus a lower sulfur trioxide yield. Hence why compromise conditions of 450 degrees celsius are enforced. Increasing the pressure not only increases the rate of reaction, but also the yield because of the 3 to 2 mol ratio of gases, with equilibrium shifting to the right hand side as it contains the lesser number of moles of gas. But, due to economical reasons, cost savings and for safety, only pressures of 1-2 atmospheres are enforced in this reaction vessel. The yield of sulfur trioxide could be also increased through the removal of the product, causing equilibrium to shift to the right and produce more sulfur trioxide. One factor that industrial chemists have manipulated and enforced, to acquire maximum yield is through decreasing the temperature while subsequently passing it over catalytic beds of vanadium oxide. Chemists, pass it over a first catalytic bed at 450 degrees celsius and have a 70% conversion rate of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide. Lowering temperatures increases yield however decreases the rate, but passing it over a second catalytic bed counteracts that dilemma, converting sulfur dioxide into 97% sulfur trioxide, and finally a third conversion results in 99.7% sulfur trioxide formation. These steps are necessary as it allows for maximum yield to be produced in a cheap and economically viable manner, thus leading to increased gains and profits.Well goodluck with this Q (taken from a 2014 commercial paper): View attachment 30993
with the commercial papers yes, and like 2 selective schools, but i am limited in the number of papers i have.have you done all the 2013 ones?