• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Help on multiple choice questions? (1 Viewer)

bhsrepresent

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2012
Messages
159
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
1) A reduction on the NPI deficit causes a fall in the supply of $A (and thus depreciation) because a smaller NPI deficit requires less $A to service the inflows from the f.account that exit as outflows on the NPI -> So basically, a lower NPI deficit means that Australians reduce the amount of currency they SUPPLY on the FOREX market to meet the servicing commitments

2) You need to work out the multiplier so that you can determine the equilibirum level of income, since the new equilibrium level of income for year 3 will be determined by 300 + 40(K)

In order to do this, calculate the MPC (since they've given you consumption and income you do this by determining the change in consumption divided by the change in income):

90(change in consumption over two years) DIVIDED by 150 (Change in income over two years) = 0.6

So if the MPC is 0.6, you know that the MPS is 0.4 and you can now calculate K

K = 1/ MPS
K = 1/ 0.4
K = 2.5

Equilibrium income for year 3 = 300 + 40(K)
= 300 +100
= 400

3. Borrowing from the RBA is more likely to result in inflation since this form of financing involves printing money without a proportional increase in output of g&s. Since according to the quantity theory of money, inflation is caused when money supply increases without a proportional increase in output, and this form of financing expansionary fiscal policy involves the RBA purchasing T.Bonds without any increase in output, it will cause inflation.
 

leesh95

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2011
Messages
487
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2013
1) A reduction on the NPI deficit causes a fall in the supply of $A (and thus depreciation) because a smaller NPI deficit requires less $A to service the inflows from the f.account that exit as outflows on the NPI -> So basically, a lower NPI deficit means that Australians reduce the amount of currency they SUPPLY on the FOREX market to meet the servicing commitments

2) You need to work out the multiplier so that you can determine the equilibirum level of income, since the new equilibrium level of income for year 3 will be determined by 300 + 40(K)

In order to do this, calculate the MPC (since they've given you consumption and income you do this by determining the change in consumption divided by the change in income):

90(change in consumption over two years) DIVIDED by 150 (Change in income over two years) = 0.6

So if the MPC is 0.6, you know that the MPS is 0.4 and you can now calculate K

K = 1/ MPS
K = 1/ 0.4
K = 2.5

Equilibrium income for year 3 = 300 + 40(K)
= 300 +100
= 400

3. Borrowing from the RBA is more likely to result in inflation since this form of financing involves printing money without a proportional increase in output of g&s. Since according to the quantity theory of money, inflation is caused when money supply increases without a proportional increase in output, and this form of financing expansionary fiscal policy involves the RBA purchasing T.Bonds without any increase in output, it will cause inflation.
Wouldn't that be an appreciation?
 

NWO

Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2013
Messages
464
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Yeah, thats what i thought. There is an appreciation of the AUD, and the supply decreases. I thought that an increase in demand, higher confidence, and imports would lead to an appreciation of the AUD. But if the supply decreases,... IDK lol fk gonna fail. just started studying after ext math :(
 

NWO

Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2013
Messages
464
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
If the RBA uses a contractinary monetary policy or tightening monetary stance, this will mean selling government securities results in high interest rates.

And Q13, which year is that again?
 
Last edited:

elecsplash

Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
38
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
If the RBA uses a contractinary monetary policy or tightening monetary stance, this will mean selling government securities results in high interest rates.

And Q13, which year is that again?
2010
 

studybuddy101

Active Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
103
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Can you explain? :\
crowding out effect is simply an increase in demand for cash by the private sector. Higher demand raises the cost of borrowing funds using simple price mechanism stuff (expand the demand curve and equilibrium shifts)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top