11) B (levered) = B (unlevered)(1+(1-t)(D/E))= 0.9565(1+(0.6)(0.4/0.6))=1.3391If anyone is keen, could i grab a hand with Q11, 12,13 and 14 of 2006 paper?
11) B (levered) = B (unlevered)(1+(1-t)(D/E))= 0.9565(1+(0.6)(0.4/0.6))=1.3391
Re = 0.05 + 1.3391(0.06)=0.1303
12) WACC = 0.1075 .:. Accept V, W and X (WACC > IRR) Total value = 3.4 m
Since 50% equity financed; 1.7 m will go towards retained earnings leaving 0.8 m paid out as dividend
Pay out ratio = 0.8/2.5 = 0.32
13) Flotation cost gets subtracted from market price of share, then normal stuff:
0.123 = 0.4(0.11)(1-t)+0.1(1/9)+0.5(14/85)
Solve for t
14) 1.2x0.4 = 0.48
Net income = (2M-5x0.1 - 0.48Mx0.1) x (1-0.4) = 871200
Dividends = 871200 - 0.72M
Ratio = (871200 - 0.72M)/871200 = 0.174
repeated question as in they copied and paste from the practice question or just similar?holy shit question 11 was a repeated question from the practice papers :/
Anyway, gonna start the 2006 paper now
I swear I've never seen (Or I don't recall) any material in lectures/textbook about the relationship of the betas between an unlevered firm and the levered firm11) B (levered) = B (unlevered)(1+(1-t)(D/E))= 0.9565(1+(0.6)(0.4/0.6))=1.3391
What I'm trying to say is that I don't think that's going to be in tomorrow's finals given that we (sem2 2012) have never covered such material.just type it up on the internet.
copy and paste.repeated question as in they copied and paste from the practice question or just similar?
Awesome, this might just be my only chance of passing this course >copy and paste.
_______________________
far out, how does one get Q5 and 6 of the 2006 paper =_=
oh wait nvm i found why for Q6. but for Q5.copy and paste.
_______________________
far out, how does one get Q5 and 6 of the 2006 paper =_=
good point. hopefully it isnt. i saw some other questions in past papers relating to covariance which we havent done.What I'm trying to say is that I don't think that's going to be in tomorrow's finals given that we (sem2 2012) have never covered such material.
hehehe we covered that in ACTL1001good point. hopefully it isnt. i saw some other questions in past papers relating to covariance which we havent done.
yeah they tell you its the variance over the expected return or some shithehehe we covered that in ACTL1001
but if they were to cover covariance, then they'd try as hard to give us formulas for that...
same with DTL equation no idea what the fuck that was onI swear I've never seen (Or I don't recall) any material in lectures/textbook about the relationship of the betas between an unlevered firm and the levered firm
Won't be tested on. if it does get tested on then FUARRRRRsame with DTL equation no idea what the fuck that was on