Disagree with the widespread msm consensus that Obama won the debate. I'd say it went narrowly to Romney but expectations were much higher for Romney.
do you guys reckon Romney's past with his private equity firm will give him any sort of advantage over Obama. he kept mentioning it in the debate.the reason people think obama won is because they had such low expectations. The fact that he didn't fuck things up was enough to send liberals into celebtration mode. I think romney won, though it wasn't nearly the convincing win of the first debate. It however has not destroyed his momentum though.
lol i thought the moderator was supposed to stay impartial. she didnt exactly make it easier for him.the libya bit with him misquoting the president about calling it a terrorist attack was a bit embarrassing :s
Not fucking momentum again.the reason people think obama won is because they had such low expectations. The fact that he didn't fuck things up was enough to send liberals into celebtration mode. I think romney won, though it wasn't nearly the convincing win of the first debate. It however has not destroyed his momentum though.
I think it should, it shows he knows what he's doing in terms of budgets and what not, however it's important to note the difference in scale and the political implications and obstacles when dealing with a federal government budget. The thing that might come back to bite him is that he may come across as a bit too reckless or 'unfeeling', so to say, about where and what he cuts from the budget, like he would need to be in a business aspect.do you guys reckon Romney's past with his private equity firm will give him any sort of advantage over Obama. he kept mentioning it in the debate.
You've just described every politician ever.The reality is though is that Obama, a brilliant orator promised a lot although failed to deliver.
lolYou've just described every politician ever.