this is a little bit random
but generally is your rank more important or ur mark??
people are telling me ur rank is more important
but lets say u were first in physics
but that mark is only 79? or 80?
would it be better to be 4th in class, and get a score of 90??
Marks determine ranks. It's how much you differ from the person who has more marks than you, which is what is important. Coming 2nd by 2 marks will give you a better result than coming second by 20 marks.
Are those marks raw? If they are raw marks, then you can't compare them. They carry no meaning. The mark itself, without context, has no meaning. The mark compared to other marks is very important. Plus, you need to know your HSC exam results in order to calculated the moderated assessment mark, so ATM, all marks are just a few digits you have gained throughout the year.
im getting really confused, ive always thought the rank was important, but without a good mark how can ur rank really get u anywhere? :S
and also like when u type stuff in the atar calc it only asks for ur marks, regardless of ranks
and they give u a pretty accurate estimate (within + or - 4 atar points)
Rank isn't something which carries importance (except if you're first or last). You can come last in one subject and get a better HSC result than if you were 1st or 5th or 10th in another. It's the marks which matter.
You type in your final HSC mark in those ATAR Calculators. Obviously, you don't know your HSC marks because you haven't sat the HSC, but it's what you predict your marks to be. HSC marks take into account your school performance, so that's where the inclusion of ranks or raw marks is.
They are only accurate for that certain year because most of them go by the UAC data tables. However, the higher the marks, the less volatile it can be (because there's only so much you can scale). So it can be within 1 ATAR or it could be off by 10 - scaling is carried out afresh each year.