Yes, I've heard the same! However, most people misjudge the 'harder' statement. Modern's probably only slightly more difficult because of the need to memorise dates, events and information about icons of the 20th century. Content-wise, I would say Ancient is heavier. The only 'easy' thing about Ancient is that you can sort of make things up really (as long as you back them up), and no one can say anything because most ancient sources are lost. You can always say things like 'historians believe that" etc etc and still get the marks. Modern= detail. Is all.Apparently Modern's harder... or something. I'm not too sure. :/
I'm pretty sure both histories require you to analyse sources.
Do modern. Modern. MODERNNNNNN. I can't emphasise this enough. Half the kids who picked ancient in my grade are dropping it, myself included.Yes, unfortunately I know its gonna be a HUGE challenge taking on 2 extensions, but then again, I have more free periods than any one else in my year!! So yippeeee more time to study and stuff
Anguyenh, so you think Modern would have been a better choice? I think the hardest choice in my life by far was Ancient vs. Modern... and I picked Ancient although I badly wanted Modern (modern teachers are crap in my school) cause my Ancient teachers were previously HSC markers and they really know their stuff. Are you serious??? ESSAYS AND ANALYSIS! Freaking great! Should have chosen Modern
Do modern. Modern. MODERNNNNNN. I can't emphasise this enough. Half the kids who picked ancient in my grade are dropping it, myself included.
The content looks interesting on paper. Trojans and bog bodies and Boudicca the super awesome queen - who wouldn't want to learn about them, right? It actually turns out that all we do is speculate on what /could/ have happened. That is the gist of ancient history - you examine different sources and evidences to deduce what may have happened, what may have triggered a certain event, what conflicting perspectives there are, et al. It sounds great theoretically, but when you have to actually learn about it in class, most kids found out that they'd rather work with more recent materials that are much more relevant to contemporary society. Modern is much more interesting, in my opinion; you learn about WWII and other nations, and other events that are actually applicable. (as in you could trace a link between these events and its impact on our modern society) I have a friend who does both ancient and modern, and she hates ancient. My greatest regret is picking ancient instead of modern.OMFG! It's too late, I already picked Ancient!!!!!!!!!!! AH! I should've bloody picked Modern! What's so bad about Ancient??? Dude, you're freaking me out!
If ancient is your school's best subject, do you think you can get a band 6 in it easier than one in modern? Will you be dedicated enough to achieve a band 6 in a subject you don't enjoy, regardless of your school's prowess? You need to ask yourself these questions, instead of letting teachers influence you. I suggest trying ancient for a few weeks in year 11, then seeing if you want to keep it or not. I suppose the question is this: do you want modern or biology more?To be honest, it didn't even look interesting to me on paper at all! Modern did. But, my mind was getting crowded with all the comments and recommendations of teachers that I couldn't even hear my own voice. In my school, Ancient gets the Band 6s. It's our strongest subject. Teachers are great and are so passionate, they make everything sound interesting.
I initially wanted Modern. Such an idiot for not actually picking it! The saddest thing is, I can't swap a subject for Modern anymore. I'm pretty much stuck, because the only subject of mine that runs on the Modern line is Biology, and I surely cannot drop that....or can I?
So pissed and disappointed!