Re: The Official Cricket Thread
luv dat f33lIndia lost to Bangladesh. feels so gooood
luv dat f33lIndia lost to Bangladesh. feels so gooood
he lost it for them, his century was too slowEven when Tendulkar fires...
Strike rate of 77. Maybe not ideal but I guess he was the 'anchor' and others should have batter around him. Kohli's SR was marginally better and I think he has the potential score a lot faster than Tendulkar.he lost it for them, his century was too slow
slow century? makes me think of dravid's glorious 20-something strike ratehe lost it for them, his century was too slow
Kohli imo is like the ponting of india, obviously he can't be tendulkar (never know tho)Strike rate of 77. Maybe not ideal but I guess he was the 'anchor' and others should have batter around him. Kohli's SR was marginally better and I think he has the potential score a lot faster than Tendulkar.
100th 100he lost it for them, his century was too slow
Dravid's one day strike rate was 71, and like most batsman the bigger the score he got the faster his strike rate would have been. So in innings over 50 he would nearly always have scored at 80+, obviously it depends on the pitch and the bowling but generally to score at 77 when you score over a hundred is pretty bad. I think Tendulkar's reflexes are going, he isn't hitting down the wicket much anymore and I think that's because if he uses the pace of the ball and mostly hits square then against quick bowlers he can decide later, winding up and hitting down the line means committing pretty early and I reckon he's probably not picking it early enough to do that. In a test environment you can get away with modifying your game like that but in limited overs cricket it'll increasingly become a problem. I really think he needs to consider his positionslow century? makes me think of dravid's glorious 20-something strike rate
i think the indian selectors need to give him a few more ODI matches. it might just be that the pressure of the 100th 100 was affecting his game. he hit 52 off 48 balls in the match against pakistan after he got the monkey off his back.Dravid's one day strike rate was 71, and like most batsman the bigger the score he got the faster his strike rate would have been. So in innings over 50 he would nearly always have scored at 80+, obviously it depends on the pitch and the bowling but generally to score at 77 when you score over a hundred is pretty bad. I think Tendulkar's reflexes are going, he isn't hitting down the wicket much anymore and I think that's because if he uses the pace of the ball and mostly hits square then against quick bowlers he can decide later, winding up and hitting down the line means committing pretty early and I reckon he's probably not picking it early enough to do that. In a test environment you can get away with modifying your game like that but in limited overs cricket it'll increasingly become a problem. I really think he needs to consider his position
Held up only by Chanderpaul though.Can't hear a word against Sachin, sorry guys, he's still the best batman out there and his record against the Aussies is phenomenal, he just had a bad series this time around (he's past that milestone of his now too btw).
Anyone following (or followed) Aus vs WI? I was surprised how well WI played on such dodgy pitches!
Cricket and soccer are both amazing though.I never played cricket, soccer is the way to go for me.