this is wrong, you can easily get a modulus of 1 by letting arg(z1)=arg(z2)+pi, and even then lesser moduli are possible. i'm working on it now.I got the lowest value possible for |z1 + z2| is the square root of 109.
EDIT: I forgot to consider negatives, will have another attempt.
My new answer is square root of (61-42root2) which is approximately 1.266.
z2 is in the first quadrant, so arg(z2) + pi would be in the second quadrant.this is wrong, you can easily get a modulus of 1 by letting arg(z1)=arg(z2)+pi, and even then lesser moduli are possible. i'm working on it now.
edit: the question is effectively "find the least modulus of (x-4)^2 + (y-3)^2 = 36".
edit2: wait no, i made a calculation error. the least modulus is one.
sure. when you add pi, you won't get an argument in the second quadrant, you'll get an argument in third quadrant. any argument + pi will result in an argument in the opposite quadrant, ie if the original argument was in quadrant 1, then the resultant one would be in q3. if it was in q2, it would then be in q4 and so on.z2 is in the first quadrant, so arg(z2) + pi would be in the second quadrant.
When you add these complex numbers together you're going to get a modulus greater than 1 aren't you?
z1 would have to be either in the third of fourth quadrant so that you get the smallest modulus possible? So letting arg(z1) = arg(z2) + pi wouldn't give the smallest possible modulus.
Could you explain how you got 1 as an answer, I want to see what I'm doing wrong.
Thanks, I know what I was doing wrong now lol. I confused 'pi' with 'i' and thought that adding pi would add 90 degrees(which is what you do when multiplying by i).sure. when you add pi, you won't get an argument in the second quadrant, you'll get an argument in third quadrant. any argument + pi will result in an argument in the opposite quadrant, ie if the original argument was in quadrant 1, then the resultant one would be in q3. if it was in q2, it would then be in q4 and so on.
effectively, if you add pi to an argument, and plot the lines that result, you'll get a straight line, and this will point in the opposite direction. this means that when you add the complex numbers the modulus will be effectively "cancelled" since you have a modulus of 6 in the opposite direction, and a fixed modulus of 5, so you'll get a complex number that has an arg of tan^-1(3/4) +- pi (adding or subtracting pi is the same thing in terms of the principal argument of complex numbers), and a modulus of one.
if that doesn't make sense i can draw up a diagram if you like
strictly speaking it would have made more sense for me to say that we should let arg(z2)=arg(z1) +- pi, such that arg(z2) lies in the third quadrant.