- Joined
- Mar 20, 2011
- Messages
- 2,180
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
How'd you do, Richard?
How'd you do, Richard?
some1 has already done that m8Ext1 Maths 100
Ext2 Maths 99
Ext1 Eng 99
Chemistry 98
Physics 100
overall really happy of my results ^^
BULLLSHIIIT man!!! are you serious????some1 has already done that m8
i meant someone has already trolled by posting ridiculous marksBULLLSHIIIT man!!! are you serious????
What maths marks did this bitch get ? XPSo... who else is reading this thread and feeling like this:
I hate you all
Eng - 85 b5
Phy - 89 b5
Chem - 87 b5
Math - 93 b6
Ext 1 - 44 e3
SOR 1 - 44 b5
But on the matrix calculator, if I put 44 for ext 1 and sor 1 I get atar of 86 or something. But if I do ATAR to HSC and put 95 ATAR, the ext 1 and SOR 1 becomes out of 100
But on atarcalculator.com.au, I get 95.45.
wth ?
3U was crazy hard...according to SMH. But you're not talking about 3U.This kid here just got lucky with maths because it was a really easy paper. He would chocked massive had it been harder
Son, the paper was a joke.3U was crazy hard...according to SMH.
You were the one that bought up 3unit. But they were both piss easy. Just look at the 2011 2unit Q10 . It was about Q3 standard.But you're not talking about 3U.
WTFFF only 96 for ext1 from YOOU? fuark woulda thought you'd get 98 at least. Mate, you've been helping me on the maths forums for the past 2 yrs on BOS - i got 95 in ext1 -- you must've had like a billion silly mistakes .... still great marks tho, good job mandear board of studies,
fuck you
-----
eng adv: 85
maths 3u: 96
maths 4u: 94
physics: 92
chem: 91
atar estimate: 98.90
-----
hopefully the scaling shit changes so i scrape into 99 territory
*fingers crossed*
It was also an easy paper as well. About General Maths level difficulty. Oxeh should jump off a cliff.WTFFF only 96 for ext1 from u? Mate, you've been helping me on the maths forums for the past 2 yrs on BOS - i got 95 -- must have been a billion silly mistakes.... still great marks tho, good job man
I reckon the article was correct in saying the paper was unusual and thus hard. But it was the sort of hard where if you'd prepared properly it wouldn't be too bad, whereas if you had only drilled standard questions then you'd be blocking yourself out of getting into higher mark ranges. What throws people out is variation from convention: and the sad part of all this is that there's a convention to deviate from in the first place.I don't agree with the article, but I do admit the paper was rather long. At least for me.