someonehomebush
Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2009
- Messages
- 110
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
It's age of victim.. pretty sure (process of elimination)*raises hand in triumph*
It's age of victim.. pretty sure (process of elimination)*raises hand in triumph*
i meant for the bank robbery one lols. And explain why age of victim is an aggrevating factor not an "offender not being aware of the consequences of their actions"It's age of victim.. pretty sure (process of elimination)
Just got trolled xD woopsthats what i put *raises other hand*
yeh i posted and it was totally not what i responded to hahaJust got trolled xD woops
Raise your feet it's age of the victim ... Not knowing the consequences of his actions is being negligent which isn't really a aggravating factor .. For example negligence in murder often results in the charge being man slaughter so that's not really aggravating .. Like the guy up their said process of elimination gave me the only reasonable one agethats what i put *raises other hand*
nevaaa, but i see your point now. There is no intention to commit the crime i guess why it isnt a.Raise your feet it's age of the victim ... Not knowing the consequences of his actions is being negligent which isn't really a aggravating factor .. For example negligence in murder often results in the charge being man slaughter so that's not really aggravating .. Like the guy up their said process of elimination gave me the only reasonable one age
but why isn't it age of offender? during the exams i was thinking that it could be both..It's the age of the victim, the offender not being aware is like doli incapax, which is not an aggravating factor, more of a mitigating factor
You have a couple wrong the ones I am sure of is that 7 is d , 10 d , 11, d ,Not entirely sure if all these are correct but here goes.
1 d
2 b
3 a
4 c
5 a
6 c
7 b
8 c
9 a
10 c
11 c
12 a
13 d
14 b
15 b
16 d
17 a
18 b
19 d
20 c
she wouldn't have been waiting if she didn't know about the act beforehand, therefore they could have designated her with that duty before the crime = planning. An accessory before the crime is someone who helps them plan right?The girl was an accessory AFTER the fact as she assisted after! just because she was 'waiting' doesnt mean shes an accessory before.
i agree with accessory after the fact. Helped them get awayis it? wouldn't accessory before the fact be like she drove them to the bank? i put accessory after the fact because she was helping them AFTER the crime was committed. But idk
Haha exactly!Judge is correct .. The role of the judge is to conduct trial by the rule of the law direct the jury in their role.. Permit relevant evidence bla bla jury has no role in answering questions of the law they sit shut up and give a verdict
I agree with youshe wouldn't have been waiting if she didn't know about the act beforehand, therefore they could have designated her with that duty before the crime = planning. An accessory before the crime is someone who helps them plan right?
that was a tricky question. seriously, wtf.
20 is definitely BYou have a couple wrong the ones I am sure of is that 7 is d , 10 d , 11, d ,
q3 is D and q11 is CYou have a couple wrong the ones I am sure of is that 7 is d , 10 d , 11, d ,
Human rights are enforceable ... Your tellin me they haven't enforced labour human rights such as working age ?? How could you be so adamant its c lol ?q3 is D and q11 is C