noworriez1
Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2011
- Messages
- 456
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
^ that
That's the point...there is none. There are so many schools of Islam, so many people arguing about whether or not it should include just the Quran, or the Sunaat and Hadith as well that there is no definitive version of it. So that's why its an irrelevant form of law. Law needs to be stable, objective and definitive, not shifting depending on the subjective views of different people on the metaphysical teachings of Allah and his Prophets.
Not only that, but the application of religious law automatically excludes those outside the religion, who would feel no obligation to adhere to the laws of a religion they are not a disciple of. Hardly "equality".
Plus Australia has a perfectly fine legal system and there is no reason why it should be replaced. Religious law is irrelevant when secular law provides a more universal and fairer version of law anyway.
as i said no one really knows it...its been changed according to one to suit themselves..im sorry
but in no way does it promote equality
Democracy is the law of the devil.lol we'd have this lad in charge
i said i agreee???obviously duha ignores the well thought out and coherent thoughts of mirakon. move along, folks.
i don't know ...srs question though
I love the reaction of negus.lol we'd have this lad in charge
what ethnicity are youi don't know ...
that muslim is a complete retard, but still it always annoys me when during interviews the host just keeps cutting off the other person to get their point acrosslol we'd have this lad in charge
Duha_h
middle eastern (u can kinda tell by the name)
but i reckon... either: Iraqi or palestinian
i swear 2 god tht was my 1st guess but i swapped it with iraqiwrong pakistani
ehh middle east ??i swear 2 god tht was my 1st guess but i swapped it with iraqi
and then i wrote middle-eastehh middle east ??
loland then i wrote middle-east