The beauty about Mathematics is that it is not like other subjects. You have to be accurate, not like in HSIE subjects or English where you can just write any sentence that makes sense and relates to the topic and blabber about it. With Maths, you can only have one answer. No, 4U is not "easy", but it is not "hard" either. Actually, I don't believe there is anything "hard" or "easy." If you can't understand something, you won't get it.1. There's a difference between saying anybody can do it and saying that it is easy. There's a reason why not that many people take extension 2 mathematics, its because its difficult. Yes its difficulty is overrated, but by no means is it 'easy'. If it was so easy, people would be getting 100% all the time, but that just doesn't happen.
2. Yes that's what you start off with, but there's much more too it. Hell, most people start off with curve sketching which barely has algebra.
Dangerous suggestion. How do you define "average"? Some really average student reading this may decide to go for 4U to their ultimate detriment.When I said I was "average", I didn't mean it in that way. Perhaps I shouldn't have said that. True, if you're an "okay-ish" at Maths, 2U would be far more suitable to you or 3U. But there's no reason an average person in Maths can't learn the course. I mean, common, you are sitting there for a whole year; how can you not learn anything? That's why I suggest anyone remotely good at Maths should go for the course. It is very rewarding and the scaling is enormous, and no I am not in favour of people trying out 4U just for the scaling, it will be a complete waste of your time. You would much rather spend your time studying for something that you like.
Noone in the state got full marks for that question...I think that was a terrible question. Because some students who were doing extracurricular maths in maths clubs etc had seen that question before and knew how to do it and therefore it was unfair on other students who had not seen that question before. Apparently it was written by someone at USyd.
Also, apparently the 1989 paper had quite a few errors.
Not exactly sure if srs.... you're telling me you're hoping for 99+.... good joke...Hoping for 99+
Be sure to let us know what you get for MX2 in December. I'm expecting you to beat every single person on this forum if that's the case.It's called setting goals and working hard towards them. Yes, I will be dissapointed with anything less than 99+.
So what if they've seen the question before? That's the BOS' fault and a great amount of luck on the part of the students who saw it.I think that was a terrible question. Because some students who were doing extracurricular maths in maths clubs etc had seen that question before and knew how to do it and therefore it was unfair on other students who had not seen that question before. Apparently it was written by someone at USyd.
Also, apparently the 1989 paper had quite a few errors.
Those really great at maths usually do not boast about their abilities.you are such a douche, should have just named the thread, 'I am really good at maths, everyone read this so you can learn about how good I am at maths.'
lol. then why did u even make this thread. now everything you said sounds like u were showing off.It's called setting goals and working hard towards them. Yes, I will be dissapointed with anything less than 99+.
how u goin presently, u must go to a selective skool and be coming first obviously.I am not boasting about my abilities in Maths. Someone said that it would be interesting to see what I got for 4U for my HSC, and I said I hoped for 99+. It's what I am working towards.