qanda (1 Viewer)

[SylviaB]

lol that would be *amazing*

except I would never ever do it

could ruin your life if you get recognised

 

[SylviaB]

I still think the "It's a theory, just like gravity" guy was trollin'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNs3jNj-DV8&feature=feedu

 

[SylviaB]

havent we talked about this before

 

[cosmo kramer]

lol that would be *amazing*

except I would never ever do it

could ruin your life if you get recognised

yeah agreed

not worth it

but fuck it would be amazing

just get the aussie stormfront contingent to do it

i doubt they'd give a shit

 

[Slide]

You have to submit questions and then they select which ones to get asked

I still think the "It's a theory, just like gravity" guy was trollin'

that ruins the whole concept of the show if they ask the audience which political persuasion they will be so they can stack the crowd and selectively choose the questions to ruin the spontaneity of it all.

 

[Chemical Ali]

we should troll them royally

just get a bunch of bosers to say they're in the greens and apply then we all turn up and ask racist questions through the whole show

if they ever have an episode with an educator who specialises in the aboriginal achievement gap it would be so perfect

this has kind of happened before

they used the qanda studio to screen and debate the "great global warming swindle" documentary a couple years back

and in the question time afterwards, the whole thing got hijacked by the Citizens Electoral Council (LaRouchian nutbags)

it's still on youtube I think

 

[Lentern]

You called the distinction between undergraduate and PhD arbitrary in terms of expertise

I did not.

 

[SylviaB]

ugh so you make these vague psuedo-witty comments, and then when I respond to the meaning that any normal person would infer from them, you scream straw-man

ffs post properly

 

[Lentern]

ugh so you make these vague psuedo-witty comments, and then when I respond to the meaning that any normal person would infer from them, you scream straw-man

ffs post properly

What I was conveying was perfectly clear. I did not suggest there was no meaningful difference between a Phd graduate and an undergraduate but as the comparisons between Green and Hammond served to illicit, the existence of a higher qualification doesn't in itself prohibit someone from claiming the status of expert. It's perfectly legitimate to have a different opinion as to where someone transcends inexpert and becomes an expert but for you or I to pretend that the line we has drawn is not a completely subjective one is delusory. You were aware that this was what I was saying, you aren't stupid although somewhat insane, so stop this wounded bull bellowing about how I'm not playing for.

 

[SylviaB]

What I was conveying was perfectly clear. I did not suggest there was no meaningful difference between a Phd graduate and an undergraduate but as the comparisons between Green and Hammond served to illicit, the existence of a higher qualification doesn't in itself prohibit someone from claiming the status of expert.

My point wasn't that there is someone with a higher qualifications so threfore she with the lower qualifications is always not an expert.

I was talking about undergraduate degrees in absolute terms.

It's perfectly legitimate to have a different opinion as to where someone transcends inexpert and becomes an expert but for you or I to pretend that the line we has drawn is not a completely subjective one is delusory.

You said ARBITRARY. Words have different meanings you know.

 

[Lentern]

My point wasn't that there is someone with a higher qualifications so threfore she with the lower qualifications is always not an expert.

I was talking about undergraduate degrees in absolute terms.



You said ARBITRARY. Words have different meanings you know.

Yeah but for me to clarify and develop a point is a bit different because, well, I know what the mindset was. For you it was just putting words into another persons mouth. But I'm happy to remove the term subjective from the equation if it helps you engineer a response.

 

[cosmo kramer]

this has kind of happened before

they used the qanda studio to screen and debate the "great global warming swindle" documentary a couple years back

and in the question time afterwards, the whole thing got hijacked by the Citizens Electoral Council (LaRouchian nutbags)

it's still on youtube I think

lol really i want to see this

what do you propose i google to find it?

 

[SylviaB]

all I could find was this:

[youtube]I24QOvMUUyw[/youtube]

i think theres a few more on the guys channel

 

[cosmo kramer]

lmao

eugenics


major trolled

that bald dickhead at the end couldnt answer the last question

 

[Blastus]

this has kind of happened before

they used the qanda studio to screen and debate the "great global warming swindle" documentary a couple years back

and in the question time afterwards, the whole thing got hijacked by the Citizens Electoral Council (LaRouchian nutbags)

it's still on youtube I think

yes and that is my FAVOURITE thing on youtube - I'm glad someone else watched it. I talk about it as my favourite wingnut clip EVER.

 

[Lentern]

so anyone watching it now? I was going to but, like, stuff.

 

[cosmo kramer]

0its not like a big deal if you dont catch it on tv when every episode goes up on the internet on their site anyway

 

[Lentern]

0its not like a big deal if you dont catch it on tv when every episode goes up on the internet on their site anyway

You miss out on the twitter conversation then which is really the whole point I thought.

 

[Chemical Ali]

they pretty much say the same things every week

 

[Blastus]

You miss out on the twitter conversation then which is really the whole point I thought.

take it from me the twitter conversation is terrible