blackops23
Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2010
- Messages
- 428
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
Hi here's a question where I was successfully able to get the answer however my solution was way too long. As with most math questions, there always seems to be an alternative ninja method that cuts the working out in half. If possible, I'd like someone to think of a ninja solution, because I'm out of ideas.
here's the question:
Q. Two points, P and Q, move on the parabola x^2 = 4ay so that the x-coordinates of P and Q differ by a constant value, 2a. What is the locus of M, the mid-point of PQ?
Solution:
Its too long to write here, so I will just state what I did.
I let P=(2ap,ap^2) and Q=(2aq,aq^2)
But x-coordinates of P and Q differ by (2a)
So P=(2ap,ap^2) BUT Q=(2ap - 2a, aq^2)
So Q=(2a(p-1), aq^2)
which means, 2aq = 2a(p-1)
therefore, q=p-1
then I subbed that value of q in aq^2
so Q=(2a(p-1), a(p-1)^2)
and P=(2ap,ap^2)
Using these two values, I found the midpoint which was:
M=( a(2p-1), [a(2p^2 - 2p + 1)]/2 )
then x = a(2p-1)
rearranging to make p the subject
p= (x+a)/2a
then I subbed that into y=[a(2p^2 - 2p + 1)] /2, which was the main reason why the solution was so freaking long.
Is there any alternative method to find the LOCUS of M, using a shorter more elegant method?
Thanks guys.
here's the question:
Q. Two points, P and Q, move on the parabola x^2 = 4ay so that the x-coordinates of P and Q differ by a constant value, 2a. What is the locus of M, the mid-point of PQ?
Solution:
Its too long to write here, so I will just state what I did.
I let P=(2ap,ap^2) and Q=(2aq,aq^2)
But x-coordinates of P and Q differ by (2a)
So P=(2ap,ap^2) BUT Q=(2ap - 2a, aq^2)
So Q=(2a(p-1), aq^2)
which means, 2aq = 2a(p-1)
therefore, q=p-1
then I subbed that value of q in aq^2
so Q=(2a(p-1), a(p-1)^2)
and P=(2ap,ap^2)
Using these two values, I found the midpoint which was:
M=( a(2p-1), [a(2p^2 - 2p + 1)]/2 )
then x = a(2p-1)
rearranging to make p the subject
p= (x+a)/2a
then I subbed that into y=[a(2p^2 - 2p + 1)] /2, which was the main reason why the solution was so freaking long.
Is there any alternative method to find the LOCUS of M, using a shorter more elegant method?
Thanks guys.