Democracy: forcing everybody to do something that up to 49% of the population doesn't wantbecause australia has one of the best democractic systems of government in the world.
and what do you prefer?Democracy: forcing everybody to do something that up to 49% of the population doesn't want
private property would be niceand what do you prefer?
anarchy?
a military coup?
a dictatorship?
Dude you shouldn't try and talk intellectually on a subject you know little about. No true Anarchist believes in the free market. Most are Green Anarchists, Anarcho-Syndicalists, Anarcho-Communists etc. Don't bother to study the material at hand? That's a massive generalisation.-Lemon- said:Anarchism attracts quasi-educated adolescents (who have grown up in extremely comfortable surroundings) who want rebel for the sake of it.
Their pea-brains latch onto outdated slogans like 'free markets are efficient'', 'let kids play violent rape games', etc..and from there on they don't bother to actually study the material at hand.
How is it an Anarchist society when power is distributed unfairly like that? What do living standards and comparative levels of technology in the Stone Age have to do with modern day Anarchist thought? Somalia isn't an Anarchist society. Lack of government is not the only requirement for a society with Anarchistic principles.-Lemon- said:It is for spoiled 'You-tube' fanatics, and none of them realise humans have, for the most part, lived in an anarchist society, where whoever had the most physical strength had absolute power, they don't realise that living standards in the stone-age where terrible, and that modern day living standards in Australia are pretty much a utopia compared to those in 'laissez faire' societies like Somalia.
Noam Chomsky - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia-Lemon- said:(Not to mention the fact that it has no intellectual or mathematical basis whatsoever, all economic theory and evidence suggest big government > small government)
yea but who wants to live like a savage and die at the age of 30?worked for de abodiginals didn't it
minarchists, the agnostics of the libertarian worldI probably most agree with minarchism, even after reading up on rothbard and anarcho-capitalism I just cant see how it would work in practice
It's just private property and a distribution of the monopoly of force.I probably most agree with minarchism, even after reading up on rothbard and anarcho-capitalism I just cant see how it would work in practice
I wouldn't be upset with a minarchist government, as long as there is no mandatory taxation, (see 'government finaancing in a civil society' in the virtue of selfishness by Ayn Rand for more details).I probably most agree with minarchism,
Is there something specific you're having trouble with?even after reading up on rothbard and anarcho-capitalism I just cant see how it would work in practice
private property would be nice
like that strip of grass out the front?Certain other public goods like roads and stuff.
defense is unnecessary and a huge waste of money, it's not like we're going to get invaded carte blancheprivitisation of defence namely
are you talking about s21 of the constitution?
But with this anarcho-capitalist wouldn't system the environment would be fucked anyway? Large firms do not really seems to give a shit about climate change.defense is unnecessary and a huge waste of money, it's not like we're going to get invaded carte blanche
roads subsidise geographic locations, if people want to live somewhere, pay to get the road there.
The reason we drive cars so much and are damaging the environment so much, because we put roads fucking everywhere