Mandatory Internet Censorship in Australia (4 Viewers)

[Lauchlan]

At any rate it would certainly be easier than educating you.

welcome to my world

 

[SnowFox]

i agree that the problem isnt about calls.
one problem is that majority of the time people aren't being relevent.
instead of giving a detailed proposed contradiction to whateva i say, they try to undermine me personally.
let me make one thing clear.
i am NOT for the filter mentioned this year.
what i am for is a effective filter concept, because i know that the govts filter was a fail. it may not exist, but its the concept that i agree with.
i actually respected your comment up until your last sentence. you say that its not about calls then you say that. your overreacting at someone who just as well agrees with what your saying. so please dont contradict yourself. otherwise, join the club of people who attempt so frequently to ridicule me.

This year, next year or in 20 years, there will be no such thing as a effective government controlled internet filter.

 

[Jazuzi]

snowfox the amount times you have mentioned this goddamn filter you could have made up the needed 4000+ posts in the cake thread.

 

[SnowFox]

snowfox the amount times you have mentioned this goddamn filter you could have made up the needed 4000+ posts in the cake thread.

Umm...and the other people in this thread?

Sit in a corner you dumb fuck.

 

[Jazuzi]

m8 calm down

 

[Jazuzi]

inshallah snowfox will stop posting in this thread

 

[SnowFox]

inshallah snowfox will stop posting in this thread

 

[Lauchlan]

This year, next year or in 20 years, there will be no such thing as a effective government controlled internet filter.

pessimistic much? lol calm down and look at the political context. if your liberal govt and green companions are anything like they usually are (ie. oppose rudd) then it will be blocked in the senate hands down.

you really are getting worked up for nothing.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

pessimistic much? lol calm down and look at the political context. if your liberal govt and green companions are anything like they usually are (ie. oppose rudd) then it will be blocked in the senate hands down.

you really are getting worked up for nothing.

i love this stage of the arguement

here the clearly opposition has nothing left. so now it is "gezz man its not a big deal like don't worry about it man, calm down seriously, lets just be friends and forget about it k?????"

 

[Lauchlan]

i love this stage of the arguement

here the clearly opposition has nothing left. so now it is "gezz man its not a big deal like don't worry about it man, calm down seriously, lets just be friends and forget about it k?????"

you only enter the argument when you like, and then choose the mock the argument - but continue the debate further... irony!

what would you like to argue about then? your just going to have to accept that many people are for "a" filter - depsite everything you have to say.

others, like you, oppose because it will be a pain when fair sites are blocked. fair enough - but we GET IT for JESUS CHRIST'S SAKE.

if there is something i missed than argue away with me - but you just gotta realise the whole debate is stupid (im not the only one who has said it)

btw, im not asking to be friends. never. ever. ever.

hmmm.... i suppose your next comment will be some pathetic hypothetical anti-filter argument AND/OR a personal attack on me.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

you only enter the argument when you like, and then choose the mock the argument - but continue the debate further... irony!

what would you like to argue about then? your just going to have to accept that many people are for "a" filter - depsite everything you have to say.

others, like you, oppose because it will be a pain when fair sites are blocked. fair enough - but we GET IT for JESUS CHRIST'S SAKE.

if there is something i missed than argue away with me - but you just gotta realise the whole debate is stupid (im not the only one who has said it)

btw, im not asking to be friends. never. ever. ever.

hmmm.... i suppose your next comment will be some pathetic hypothetical anti-filter argument AND/OR a personal attack on me.

bingo


well u missed the point about internet being up to 60% , how it is clearly censorship and a clear attack on freedom of speech, slower and also you may not of noticed this but....the filter won't work you know sort makes u go "oh right well maybe we shouldn't support something that will just make my internet go slower and block sites that shouldn't be blocked and will do absolutely nothing against the distribution of child porn" you know that is the rational response not the other way round aka your way

 

[Lauchlan]

People simply get tired of your shit arguments hence the personal attacks.

When people are learning what the filter is actually about, they are ultimately turning against it. Just about everyone is doing it except you, which is proven in the SMH Poll.

i keep responding, but my posts are being blocked.

you obviously cant help yourself.... congratz for reaching a new low.

idc who is blocking me, but its exactly the same as putting me on ignore. cowardly, and basically admitting 'defeat'.

 

[Entrant]

Well, Internet Censorship SEEMS like a good idea. 1 word, proxies.

 

[Lauchlan]

Well, Internet Censorship SEEMS like a good idea. 1 word, proxies.

EXACTLY - so why are most people on this thread raging about it when proxies are the solution anyways. *sigh*

 

[assiduous]

Um, aren't proxies going to be blocked anyway?

 

[Jazuzi]

yes they will block proxies so you will have to set up your own private one or use a vpn

 

[badquinton304]

EXACTLY - so why are most people on this thread raging about it when proxies are the solution anyways. *sigh*

Proxies are slow. Trust me some people do wanna see porn in HD.

 

[Lauchlan]

Proxies are slow. Trust me some people do wanna see porn in HD.

lol lets not go back to the porn discussion like you guyz did earlier.

 

[Chemical Ali]

Proxies are slow. Trust me some people do wanna see porn in HD.

or anything over a few MB in size, for that matter

 

[SnowFox]

Lol, Conroy tried upping the annoyance by abusing the CEO of Google for privacy invasion.

Google turned around and told him they are very surprised he didnt mention the Net filter, as thats why Google and the US Ambassador were there.