MedVision ad

Australian Politics (4 Viewers)

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
yes qualified Keynesian and Chicago school economists however its still an economic fallacy so try again
They didn't get these qualifications out of a vending machine, they did research to get those masters and phds.
 

scuba_steve2121

On The Road To Serfdom
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
1,343
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
They didn't get these qualifications out of a vending machine, they did research to get those masters and phds.
yea just because you have a PhD or masters doesn't mean you're smart it just means your qualified for your job. there are may different schools of economic thought and most of them have people who are professors in the field so your theory is out the window
 

Ziva

Banned
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
130
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
The lassie fare regulation of the "shadow banking" sector cannot be attributed to be the entire cause of the GFC. After the 01 reccession, the FED was reluctant to raise the domestic interest rate, to slow down growth and thus sacrifice jobs. With the i < i (n), this led to output being above the natural level, as consumption was prosperous.

There was also severe and growing financial imbalances since the AFC in 97 which combined with the share market boom eventually lead to the housing buble burst.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
yea just because you have a PhD or masters doesn't mean you're smart it just means your qualified for your job. there are may different schools of economic thought and most of them have people who are professors in the field so your theory is out the window
No, no it isn't out the window its being debated that was my point. You can't treat the infallibility of deregulation as a settled matter, that is why I brought in the academics.
 

scuba_steve2121

On The Road To Serfdom
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
1,343
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
The lassie fare regulation of the "shadow banking" sector cannot be attributed to be the entire cause of the GFC. After the 01 reccession, the FED was reluctant to raise the domestic interest rate, to slow down growth and thus sacrifice jobs. With the i < i (n), this led to output being above the natural level, as consumption was prosperous.

There was also severe and growing financial imbalances since the AFC in 97 which combined with the share market boom eventually lead to the housing buble burst.
bing bing bing we have a smart person
 

scuba_steve2121

On The Road To Serfdom
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
1,343
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
No, no it isn't out the window its being debated that was my point. You can't treat the infallibility of deregulation as a settled matter, that is why I brought in the academics.
political economics is a highly debated topic. the point I'm trying to make is that you just can't get X from school of thought Y and because of what X said means its right.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
political economics is a highly debated topic. the point I'm trying to make is that you just can't get X from school of thought Y and because of what X said means its right.
How is that different from what you've done but with different x's and y's?
 

slugboy

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
153
Location
In your mums house. Ill be waiting for you.
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
But Rudd wants to censor the internet, which actually makes him a bigger douche.

Therefore Abbott, flawed as he is, is the only choice.

nice one lol

however, its Stephen Conroy who wants to censor the internets. He just asked Rudd "Do you want to end Child Pornography on the internet y/n"

What else could you say without sounding like a pedophile
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
nice one lol

however, its Stephen Conroy who wants to censor the internets. He just asked Rudd "Do you want to end Child Pornography on the internet y/n"

What else could you say without sounding like a pedophile
Lol no, Conroy is just the poor sod giving the job of selling the clean feed. The filter is Rudd's baby, most of the cabinet would probably hate it.
 

slugboy

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
153
Location
In your mums house. Ill be waiting for you.
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
but Jesus isn't real so you lose
Prove it! Seriously. Prove that he does not exist in any way shape or form. Do not discriminate the Christian Jesus, Yahweh, The Greek's Hermes, the egyptian's Thoth, etc. etc.

By saying that he doesnt exist you are deniying him in every way, simultaneously in every religion.

I dont believe in him, but that DOES NOT MEAN that he does not exist!
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Prove it! Seriously. Prove that he does not exist in any way shape or form. Do not discriminate the Christian Jesus, Yahweh, The Greek's Hermes, the egyptian's Thoth, etc. etc.

By saying that he doesnt exist you are deniying him in every way, simultaneously in every religion.

I dont believe in him, but that DOES NOT MEAN that he does not exist!
lolwut
 

slugboy

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
153
Location
In your mums house. Ill be waiting for you.
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
+1

Hey, if you don't believe in him, how do you know he does exist?

PS. He does. Aside from the Holy Bible, many first century texts give a brief description of him. Not called Jesus, but 'Yeshua'. Look it up sometime.
I know that.

I believe the term is Agnostic. I don't believe in him, but i still achnoledge the fact that he existed, even though i don't worship him
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)

Top