boganxcore
Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2008
- Messages
- 690
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
-
Finished your HSC? Check out our University Discussion, Non-School forums or help out next year's HSC students! -
YOU can help the next generation of students in the community! Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
Question for the boys ... (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Reckoner
- Start date
Guesss
Member
wen u say legs>breasts do u mean as in long legs or big thighs etc? lol
perfect!
boganxcore
Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2008
- Messages
- 690
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
long legssss
Guesss
Member
LMAO ! I shud hook u up wif a girl i noe. except shes overseas atm! lol 
boganxcore
Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2008
- Messages
- 690
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
hook me up bbyGuesss
Member
yeh nwz, as long as she doesnt stay there!
ay0_x
Member
- Joined
- May 11, 2009
- Messages
- 524
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2009
Size 8 is perfecttttt.
Bone structure plays a major role. My friend is size 10 and she's hot as hell. As a size 10 i had undesirable bits of flab everywhere. As does muscle tone- I sree skinny size8-10 girls with such jiggly thighs it makes me want to ban them from wearing shawt shawts.
Bone structure plays a major role. My friend is size 10 and she's hot as hell. As a size 10 i had undesirable bits of flab everywhere. As does muscle tone- I sree skinny size8-10 girls with such jiggly thighs it makes me want to ban them from wearing shawt shawts.
timw7845
Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2009
- Messages
- 720
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
many-eyeshere
Member
Wow people really hate fat women. Why though, that's what I want to know. Is there any discernible reason (and leave out the trolling/ED commentary I've been reading)? See I just think it's media in the end... If you look through history women were always bigger and considered attractive. I guess it's just societal values at the time.
My opinion on the whole sizing issue, I think size ten pants and twelve top is beautifully perfect. I don't think size fourteen or sixteen is at all fat or unattractive. Smaller than that the woman usually has no figure, very small breasts and no hips. I guess I like hourglass figures.
From experience my cousins have gotten incredulity skinnier, they must be size four - six at the largest. They have no breasts, their skin has gone greyish and faces are just plain gaunt and overall they look undernourished and ill. Both have different body types one has always been say a size eight at most, while the other larger eighteen maybe. Both are around forty-five to forty-eight kilos.
I don't find that kind of skinniness attractive, oh both are very tall by the way.
As a guide for the physical guide to 'fat' and 'thin', I say that a little bit of stomach or 'flabbiness' is nice. Women's bodies need that little bit extra for genetic reasons, child-bearing, periods/menstrual bleeding etc.
I'm actually very shocked at the really aggressive comments made here by both males and females.
Our society really runs on physical standards to the point of prejudice. Why so much hate on what doesn't define a person? Shouldn't intellect be held above all else?
All I hope is that the world ends soon as promised because most of society is disgusting, hurtful and violent. At least after our generations of hate-mongers is gone and most history eradicated can humanity find traditional values again.
Anyone else wanting steam-punk here?
My opinion on the whole sizing issue, I think size ten pants and twelve top is beautifully perfect. I don't think size fourteen or sixteen is at all fat or unattractive. Smaller than that the woman usually has no figure, very small breasts and no hips. I guess I like hourglass figures.
From experience my cousins have gotten incredulity skinnier, they must be size four - six at the largest. They have no breasts, their skin has gone greyish and faces are just plain gaunt and overall they look undernourished and ill. Both have different body types one has always been say a size eight at most, while the other larger eighteen maybe. Both are around forty-five to forty-eight kilos.
I don't find that kind of skinniness attractive, oh both are very tall by the way.
As a guide for the physical guide to 'fat' and 'thin', I say that a little bit of stomach or 'flabbiness' is nice. Women's bodies need that little bit extra for genetic reasons, child-bearing, periods/menstrual bleeding etc.
I'm actually very shocked at the really aggressive comments made here by both males and females.
Our society really runs on physical standards to the point of prejudice. Why so much hate on what doesn't define a person? Shouldn't intellect be held above all else?
All I hope is that the world ends soon as promised because most of society is disgusting, hurtful and violent. At least after our generations of hate-mongers is gone and most history eradicated can humanity find traditional values again.
Anyone else wanting steam-punk here?
katietheskatie
lol
omg someone provide some arbitrary bullshit set of numbers based on their own massively subjective opinions so i can reassure myself that i'm not fat and feel better about myself lololol
philphie
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2008
- Messages
- 2,187
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
yeah i didn't read your essay, comes down to this: would you do a fat man titty man?
many-eyeshere
Member
emiliieee
Batman.
imo size 8 is yuck.
no offence to anyone who is size 8.
no offence to anyone who is size 8.
philphie
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2008
- Messages
- 2,187
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
everyone has their limitsIf they were a nice person
Yeah I'm weird like that, I don't care for appearance.