Homosexuality in Australia (1 Viewer)

[SeCKSiiMiNh]

There is nothing preventing you from living happily in an abstinent existence

You do it then.

 

[dolbinau]

There is nothing preventing you from living happily in an abstinent existence

Mm I guess. But living alone and abstinent is pretty sad/depressing.

I don't know - I agree that if God existed and he believed/said these things, then obviously homosexuality would be wrong, if 'wrong' is defined as disobeying him of course.

But I question the existence of God and (or) that he actually believed/said/held these views etc.. That is a different debate though.

 

[Iron]

Mm I guess. But living alone and abstinent is pretty sad/depressing.

I don't know - I agree that if God existed and he believed/said these things, then obviously homosexuality would be wrong, if 'wrong' is defined as disobeying him of course.

But I question the existence of God and/or that he actually believed/said/held these views etc.. That is a different debate though.

What are you talking about? If you agree that homosexuality is against natural law - against the proper and good development of a society - then why is it so impossible for the homosexual to simply refrain from such activities?

A: no self-discipline.

 

[SeCKSiiMiNh]

Who is denying you of your rights as a human?

I simply suggest that the morally corrupt lifestyle associated with homosexuality should not be encouraged or endorsed by society as it is a perversion to God.

Conservative farts such as yourself and iron of course. You live your life with your nose so deep in the bible that you fail to realise that a minority is being underhanded.

 

[dolbinau]

What are you talking about? If you agree that homosexuality is against natural law - against the proper and good development of a society - then why is it so impossible for the homosexual to simply refrain from such activities?

A: no self-discipline.

Actually that's true (my kind of contradiction, ignore me almost). I would never agree it is damaging for society, only that it is wrong if God said it is - and if God existed and he really said those things. But as I said the part I disagree in is the existence of God/whether he said those things etc.. - which is outside the scope of this topic. So I think that debating the issue with you here is rather pointless...

 

[SeCKSiiMiNh]

What are you talking about? If you agree that homosexuality is against natural law - against the proper and good development of a society - then why is it so impossible for the homosexual to simply refrain from such activities?

A: no self-discipline.

Again, let's see you try to live a life in abstinent existence.

 

[Iron]

Actually that's true (my kind of contradiction, ignore me almost). I would never agree it is damaging for society, only that it is wrong if God said it is - and if God existed and he really said those things. But as I said the part I disagree in is the existence of God/whether he said those things etc.. - which is outside the scope of this topic. So I think that debating the issue with you here is rather pointless...

You dont need God to tell you that homos cant make life...

But sure, I agree that you need God to tell you that life is worth respecting and living for others

 

[dolbinau]

You dont need God to tell you that homos cant make life...

Yes, but I can question whether 'not making life' is an immoral thing.

 

[Kwayera]

You dont need God to tell you that homos cant make life...

Neither can barren women

 

[Name_Taken]

Neither can barren women

Yes but they are physically uncapable of creating life, as opposed to the homosexual who doesn't create life as a result of chosing to live a sinful lifestyle that is represents a perversion by God

 

[Iron]

Neither can barren women

Read your bible

 

[SeCKSiiMiNh]

Yes but they are physically uncapable of creating life, as opposed to the homosexual who doesn't create life as a result of chosing to live a sinful lifestyle that is represents a perversion by God

Why are they uncapable?

 

[Iron]

Yes, but I can question whether 'not making life' is an immoral thing.

Obviously it isnt. It's the abuse of the life-giving act that we have a fundamental problem with. What is meant to bring new life into the world is turned in on the individual, mocked and trivialized.

 

[0bs3n3]

Just a refresher, In general are people 'opposed' to homosexuality saying that they believe:

- Homosexuality should be illegal,
- Homosexuality is a 'bad' thing for society that should be 'shunned',
- Homosexuality isn't natural, or
- Some other position I haven't yet considered here ?

These two personally:

- Homosexuality is a 'bad' thing for society that should be 'shunned',
- Homosexuality isn't natural

 

[Kwayera]

These two personally:

- Homosexuality is a 'bad' thing for society that should be 'shunned',
- Homosexuality isn't natural

Except it is

 

[0bs3n3]

But I question the existence of God and (or) that he actually believed/said/held these views etc.. That is a different debate though.

Question. What a polite term. I question your existence, where's the proof? I mean, it's just a bunch of characters on a screen!

 

[SeCKSiiMiNh]

These two personally:

- Homosexuality is a 'bad' thing for society that should be 'shunned',
- Homosexuality isn't natural

Yeah, homosexuality is a man-made occurance.

 

[Kwayera]

Homosexuality occurs in nature (irrespective of humans). Therefore, it is natural.

 

[SeCKSiiMiNh]

Question. What a polite term. I question your existence, where's the proof? I mean, it's just a bunch of characters on a screen!

Yeah, you're right. It could be god who's replying!

 

[0bs3n3]

Homosexuality occurs in nature (irrespective of humans). Therefore, it is natural.

Animals only exist to satisfy their desires.