Teclis
Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2008
- Messages
- 635
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2007
Dude... that was REALLY bad...U cant block out the mind's sunnn
Dude... that was REALLY bad...U cant block out the mind's sunnn
Those few christian sects, are they the Church of England?What? What a stupid and offensive thing to say. Christ violently drives out the charlatans from His temple, as we do too. You can point to a few various Christian sects (heretics), but not the Universal Church.
Honestly Lentern, I have no idea why you insist on this. Which trend are we supposedly following, or supposed to be following? What are we meant to be progressing towards? The full revelation was satisfied in the body and blood of Christ. Our only challenge is tailoring His message to new times and individuals, but the core message can never 'progress' towards any 'trend'...Those few christian sects, are they the Church of England?
Anyway I don't see whats the problem is, spreading the good news has always been a pivotal part of Christianity. Are we to ignore the more effective ways of doing so and stick to the old soapboxes and mounds in the name of appearing classical and traditional. Trendy and progressive, that is the way the church is heading.
-Female PriestsHonestly Lentern, I have no idea why you insist on this. Which trend are we supposedly following, or supposed to be following? What are we meant to be progressing towards? The full revelation was satisfied in the body and blood of Christ. Our only challenge is tailoring His message to new times and individuals, but the core message can never 'progress' towards any 'trend'...
-Women have evolved a bit since Eve and Lilith, case in point Mrs Thatcher.-Look what happened when we put Eve in charge
-There are many? Are you saying that the homo act should be endorsed, despite St Paul's view?
-Why? Having them celebrate the Holy Eucharist in trackies would increase respectability would it?
-There's a difference between condemning sin and judging individuals, ok? Christ would never have retreated from articulating the good yet forgiving the sinner
-We do all the time, as well as with Islamic, Jewish and Protestant groups, next
-Straws, u clutchin?
-We engage with the media all the time; they dont necessarily want to engage with us, k?
Your mind is clearly still weeded with hsc marxism. You have some way to go until you realise the Godlessness of your view it seems...
-In which case I tender Segolene Royale. You can't have the best of both worlds.-Thatcher is my case in point!
-Heresy most foul
-Youre an idiot. Some of the vestments date back to, like, the first century. I dont think you understand the Church at all
-More heresy. Youre verging on being an agent of death
-Point to the 'vast majority' of 'dirties' that the Church supposedly engages in or stfu
-Got sanity? At this point my faith in your Catholic knowledge collapses as I see thru the facade of ur intellect
-U nut job. You think Islam preaches to the lowest common denominator and gets them? You seem to have no understanding of the Church hierarchy or the vital importance of sacred tradition operating alongside sacred scripture. Leave thru the door Lentern and crawl back in thru the window of bitter experience later, tnks
Iron, you are resplendent in this post.-Look what happened when we put Eve in charge
-There are many? Are you saying that the homo act should be endorsed, despite St Paul's view?
-Why? Having them celebrate the Holy Eucharist in trackies would increase respectability would it?
-There's a difference between condemning sin and judging individuals, ok? Christ would never have retreated from articulating the good yet forgiving the sinner
-We do all the time, as well as with Islamic, Jewish and Protestant groups, next
-Straws, u clutchin?
-We engage with the media all the time; they dont necessarily want to engage with us, k?
Your mind is clearly still weeded with hsc marxism. You have some way to go until you realise the Godlessness of your view it seems...
The foundation of sexism-Look what happened when we put Eve in charge
-There are many? Are you saying that the homo act should be endorsed, despite St Paul's view?
-Why? Having them celebrate the Holy Eucharist in trackies would increase respectability would it?
Stop verballing me! The church whilst honouring someone not human is only a creation of the flawed human race. It is not attack on the ancestors integrity, I'm sure they were only making their best judgments but in the light of technology and advanced philosophy etc we can now make better judgments and any attempt to to make better judgments should not be swept aside as blasphemy. If it were up to you we'd still have the banquet of chestnuts.Accelorator! Accelorator! ACCELORATOR!
POOP POOP!
But the problem really seems to be is that you cant help but view the church as a political organisation whose success is based on membership numbers, rather than adherence to eternal Truth. I suppose that by your logic we wouldnt have had any martyrs because theyd all recant enthusiastically the second they were threatened by anyone! Dont rock the boat for what is essentially an obscure private belief with no place in public, says Lentern the appeasing worm
Yeah, so essentially you argue that the sacrifice and martyrdom of all believers up to this point was in vain because they didnt have knowledge of the right 'technology' and they didnt understand new philosophies. They didnt give up their lives for Truth - for Christ Himself - they merely didnt understand truth in the 'trendy and progressive' way that you clearly do.Stop verballing me! The church whilst honouring someone not human is only a creation of the flawed human race. It is not attack on the ancestors integrity, I'm sure they were only making their best judgments but in the light of technology and advanced philosophy etc we can now make better judgments and any attempt to to make better judgments should not be swept aside as blasphemy. If it were up to you we'd still have the banquet of chestnuts.
Nobody contests the noble intentions of the saints who gave their lives so selflessly merely that had they had the facts at hand that we(maybe not you) have today they might have acted differently. Likewise had the Vatican had those facts at hand then they might have recognized as many miracles as they did. They were only doing their best which is all good and well but their best wasn't as good as what we can do today. If we don't begin recognizing the mistakes of the past we will watch wave after wave of educated people read these irrational doctrines and simply say that they can't accept such crap.Yeah, so essentially you argue that the sacrifice and martyrdom of all believers up to this point was in vain because they didnt have knowledge of the right 'technology' and they didnt understand new philosophies. They didnt give up their lives for Truth - for Christ Himself - they merely didnt understand truth in the 'trendy and progressive' way that you clearly do.
Honestly Lolentern, pls m8. Did Christ understand the modern age? Did insufficient knowledge of modern technology make his sacrifice less meaningful? In what ways was Christ's philosophy lacking when matched with the modern day? Cause what it boils down to is you having the arrogance to believe that you know what Christ meant better than the Church, with its 2000yr institutional knowledge.
You can borrow my Paul Kelly CD's anytime.ps I think ur a (lovable) dag anyway