Schoey93
Member
Re: Which subject is more "prestigious" - English Extension 2 or Mathematics Extensio
"anyone with a basic skill in english could put together a 4u english major work if they worked hard enough at it and get a decent mark. for maths though, a certain skill is required"
CLAIRE:
1) Successful performance in HSC English does not require "a basic skill"; it requires SEVERAL fundamental (basic) skills, good writing technique and an excellent written expression, along with SUPERB vocabularly and high capability in manipulating language to make it work for you and the point of view you want to put across.
2) MATHS is essentially MUCH MUCH MUCH easier to acquire fundamental and complex skill in, compared to English and literature studies.
In 4u Maths, Claire, the responses aren't even subjective!! They're objective response questions (and that is for all HSC maths courses all the way from Gen. through to 4u) ... English has until perhaps the discovery of The Monty Hall Problem being much more difficult a discipline that mathematics in my opinion.
This is of course taking into account that the more complex, difficult branches of mathematics as a branch of science, but also as an artform, are not incorporated into the HSC 4u mathematics courses.
What about conjectures? What about natural proofs - mathematicians hate the kind of garbage that HSC maths teachers preach - e.g. "a geometrical proof MUST include the symbols for angles, parallel lines, vert. opp., supp. angles, alt. angles, corresp. angles and the like". It is NOT true nor is it encouraging TRUE mathematics, and that is why; I conclude now that - Claire - you're wrong. EE2 is, or at least SHOULD be much more prestigious than MX2.
James
I think maths, because really, anyone with a basic skill in english could put together a 4u english major work if they worked hard enough at it and get a decent mark. For maths though, a certain skill is required, and there are some people, who no matter how hard they work at 4u maths won't be able to do it.
"anyone with a basic skill in english could put together a 4u english major work if they worked hard enough at it and get a decent mark. for maths though, a certain skill is required"
CLAIRE:
1) Successful performance in HSC English does not require "a basic skill"; it requires SEVERAL fundamental (basic) skills, good writing technique and an excellent written expression, along with SUPERB vocabularly and high capability in manipulating language to make it work for you and the point of view you want to put across.
2) MATHS is essentially MUCH MUCH MUCH easier to acquire fundamental and complex skill in, compared to English and literature studies.
In 4u Maths, Claire, the responses aren't even subjective!! They're objective response questions (and that is for all HSC maths courses all the way from Gen. through to 4u) ... English has until perhaps the discovery of The Monty Hall Problem being much more difficult a discipline that mathematics in my opinion.
This is of course taking into account that the more complex, difficult branches of mathematics as a branch of science, but also as an artform, are not incorporated into the HSC 4u mathematics courses.
What about conjectures? What about natural proofs - mathematicians hate the kind of garbage that HSC maths teachers preach - e.g. "a geometrical proof MUST include the symbols for angles, parallel lines, vert. opp., supp. angles, alt. angles, corresp. angles and the like". It is NOT true nor is it encouraging TRUE mathematics, and that is why; I conclude now that - Claire - you're wrong. EE2 is, or at least SHOULD be much more prestigious than MX2.
James
Last edited by a moderator: